معماری مگارون در آناتولی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد باستان شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز

2 دانشیار گروه باستان شناسی دانشکده ی مرمت دانشگاه هنر اصفهان

چکیده

مگارون، گونه‌ای از انواع معماری راست‌گوشه بوده است که سده‌های متمادی به‌عنوان فرمی رایج و شاخص، در محدوده‌ی جغرافیایی شرق اروپا، غرب آسیا و به‌ویژه آناتولی مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. میزان گستردگی جغرافیایی، دوره‌ی زمانی و ویژگی‌های کاربردی این معماری موجب شکل‌گیری دیدگاه‌ها و نظرات متفاوت و گاه متضاد پیرامون ساختار و مفاهیم مرتبط با معماری مگارون شده است؛ از آن‌جمله می‌توان به‌تعریف معماری مگارون، حوزه‌ی جغرافیایی، گستره‌ی کاربری و یا تاریخِ ابداع و استفاده از این شیوه‌ی معماری اشاره کرد. در پژوهش پیش‌رو که با بهره‌گیری از گزارش‌ها و پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی و برخی متون تاریخی انجام شده است، با توجه به پیشینه‌ی تاریخی و اهمیت معماری مگارون و نقش آن در تاریخ معماری حوزه‌ی آناتولی، به این پرسش پاسخ داده شده که تعریف معماری مگارون، با درنظر داشتن دیدگاهای مختلف و گاه متضاد، به چه‌صورت می‌تواند تعریف شود؟ این پژوهش با بررسی، معرفی و شرح ساختمان‌های شناسایی شده با فرم معماری مگارون در منطقه‌ی یاد شده، افزون‌بر مشخص کردن جایگاه این معماری در جغرافیای مورد نظر، مختصاتی از دوران رواج  این معماری را در اختیار قرار داده است. کهن‌ترین آثار به‌جا مانده از  مگارون‌های آناتولی، متعلق به آغاز هزاره‌ی سوم و اواخر هزاره‌ی چهارمِ قبل‌ازمیلاد هستند. دوره‌ای که این معماری رواج‌یافته و مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است، هم‌زمان با تحولات اجتماعی و فرهنگی گسترده در منطقه‌ی غرب آناتولی، اژه و کرانه‌های شرقی مدیترانه است. معماری مگارون و انواع مشتق از آن در آناتولی و سرزمین‌های پیرامون آن، مشخصاً به‌عنوان کانون‌های مذهبی و یا سیاسی (تشریفاتی)، کارگاهی و به‌ویژه مسکونی مورد استفاده قرار گرفته‌اند و بالطبع متناسب با کارکردهای متفاوت، الحاقات و ساختارهای ثانوی و متنوعی را نیز دارا بوده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Megaron Architecture in Anatolia

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed mohammadreza ale ahmad 1
  • Farshid Iravani Ghadim 2
1 human science,Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Iran
2 Associate Professor Art University of Isfahan
چکیده [English]

Megaron -‏ shaped buildings are one of the specific kinds of rectangular architecture which have been used for many centuries, as a common and particular form, within a wide geographical range from West Asia to Europe. These types of buildings were built in central, east, and southeast of Europe, Anatolia, Aegean Cultural Area, and Eastern Mediterranean coast. The oldest remains of Megaron-shaped architectural structures were found in the Middle East on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea or Levant‏, in an archaeological site near the Jordan River, dating back to the 7th millennium B.C. In addition, the first remains of Megaron-shaped structures in Anatolia were found in the site of ancient Troy (the Hissarlik Hill), which dates back to the beginning of the 3rd millennium and the end of the 4th millennium B.C. The historical and cultural influence of this architectural style can be seen in the architectural traditions of classical antiquity in Greece and Roman civilizations, especially in the construction of residential houses and temples. The oldest written documentary evidence and reference about Megaron, as an architectural structure, has been identified in the Homer poems, an ancient Greek poet. There are hypotheses about the origin of the word Megaron refering it to the Semitic or Egyptian languages, but they have not provided sufficient evidence for their assumptions. Therefore, there is generally more agreement on the theory which the root of the word Megaron is Indo-European. Academic awareness and research around the first forms of this architecture have made major progress since 1870 and after archaeological excavation at west Turkey and Greece. The period in which this architecture was invented and used is synchronous with the widespread social complexity, cultural and economic changes in western Anatolian, Aegean, and Eastern Mediterranean regions. The spread of geographic extent, time period, and functional characteristics of Megaron buildings have led to the formation of different and sometimes contradictory views and opinions about the structure and concepts associated with the architecture of the Megaron.‏ This form of building and its derivatives, in Anatolia and its surrounding territories, are specifically used as religious, ritual or political centers (ceremonial), workshops, public buildings,‏ and especially residential buildings.‏ Hence, in accordance with different functions, many secondary functional structural ingredients have been created. This research was conducted because of the historical background and importance of the Megaron and its role in the history of Anatolian architecture, and is based on official archaeological reports in mentioned areas, and historical sources. It also addresses the issue that how the definition of the Megaron architecture can be redefined considering different and sometimes conflicting views. In this regard, the Megaron is usually a rectangular building or a right-corner construction divided into two sections by two lateral walls, the larger section (main hall), and the smaller one (vestibule). These features, regardless of other features, form the basic skeleton of the structure. In this regard, the Megaron type architecture is divided into two groups of single-structure and complexes. Secondary structures in this type of architecture are divided into two groups: structural extensions and non-structural extensions. In defining this architecture, we should not ignore variable criteria dependent on secondary factors. It should be considered that the Megaron architecture is not a fixed form with definite and absolute elements, but according to efficiency, the era, or geographic location, other functional parts may exist. In this research, in the Anatolian region, considering various indicators and important Megaron structures still more information exists to be explored about these structures apart from 100 and 71 buildings‏ identified, reviewed, and introduced to this date.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Anatolia
  • Architecture
  • Megaron
  • Vestibule
  • Porch

مراجع

 
- Arı, İ., Eres, Z., & Demirtaş, A., 2010, “Kanlıgeçit açık hava müzesi: Trakya’da bir ilk Tunç Çağ iç kalesi (Kanlıgeçit open–air museum: an early Bronze Age citadel in Thrace)’”, TÜBA-KED (Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory), 8(8), (pp.229-240).
- Banning, E. B., & Byrd, B. F., 1987 (January), “Houses and the changing residential unit: domestic architecture at PPNB ‘Ain Ghazal, Jordan”, In: Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (Vol. 53, pp. 309-325). Cambridge University Press.
- Bernal, M., 1987, Black Athena: Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, Volume I: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece, 1785-1985: Rutgers University Press.
- Blegen, C. W., Angel, J. L., Caskey, J. L., Rawson, M., & Boulter, C. G. 1950, Troy: Excavations conducted by the University of Cincinnati, 1932-1938, Princeton: Published for the University of Cincinnati by Princeton University Press.
- Blegen, C. W., 1937, “Excavations at Troy, 1936”, American Journal of Archaeology, 41(1), (pp.17-51).
- Braidwood, R. J., Haines, R. C., & Braidwood, L. S., 1971, Excavations in the Plain of Antioch: The structural remains of the later phases, Chatal Hüyük, Tell Al-Judaidah, and Tell Taʻyinat, by R.C. Haines: University of Chicago Press.
- Caskey, J. L., 1960, “The Early Helladic Period in the Argolid”. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 29(3), (pp.285-303).
- de Laet, S. J., & Dani, A. H., 1994, History of Humanity: From the third millennium to the seventh century B.C: Routledge.
- Demand, N. H., 2011, The Mediterranean context of early Greek history: John Wiley & Sons.
- DeVries, K., 1980, “Greeks and Phrygians in the Early Iron Age”, In: From Athens to Gordion: the papers of a memorial symposium for Rodney S. Young (pp. 33-50).
- DeVries, K., 1990, “The Gordion excavation seasons of 1969-1973 and subsequent research”, American Journal of Archaeology, 371-406.
- Duru, R., & Umurtak, M., 2009, “Bademağacı 2008 Yılı Kazıları (Excavations at Bademağacı in 2008)”, ANMED, (News of Archaeology from ANATOLIA’S MEDITERRANEAN) (2009-7), (pp.15-22).
- Duru, R., & Umurtak, M., 2010, “Bademağacı 2010 Yılı Kazıları (Excavations at Bademağacı in 2010)”, ANMED, (News of Archaeology from ANATOLIA’S MEDITERRANEAN) (2011-9), (pp.7-15).
- Efe, T., 2005, “Report on the 2005 Season of the Küllüoba Excavations”, Retrieved from: http://kulluobakazisi.bilecik.edu.tr/Dosya/Arsiv/kulluoba%20REPORT,2005.pdf
- Efe, T., & Fidan, E., 2008, “Complex Two in the Early Bronze II Upper Town of Küllüoba near Eskişehir”, Anatolica, 34, (pp.67-102).
- Efe, T., 2009, “Report on the 2009 Season of the Küllüoba Excavations”, Retrieved from: http://kulluobakazisi.bilecik.edu.tr/Dosya/Arsiv/K%C3%BCll%C3%BCoba%20INSTAP,%202009.pdf
- Erarslan, A., 2008, “The Anatolian Urban Model: Its Origin and Evolution (5200–2200 BC)”, In: Colloquium Anatolicum (Vol. 7, pp. 177-195).
- Easton, D. F., 2002, Schliemann’s excavations at Troia, 1870-1873, Volume 2 of Studia Troica Monographien.the University of Michigan, von Zabern.
- Fields, N., 2004, Troy C. 1700-1250 B.C., Volume 17 of Fortress (Oxford), Osprey Publishing.
- Gurney, O. R., 1995, “The Hittite Names of Kerkenes Dağ and Kuşaklı Höyük”, Anatolian studies, 45, (pp.69-71).
- Haldar, A., 1971, Who Were the Amorites? Monographs on the Ancient Near East 1. Leiden: Brill.
- Harrison, T. P., 2011, Temples, “Tablets and the Neo-Assyrian Provincial Capital of Kinalia”, Journal of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies, 6, (pp.29-37).
- Harrison, T. P., & Osborne, J. F., 2012, “Building XVI and the Neo-Assyrian sacred precinct at Tell Tayinat”, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 64, (pp.125-143).
- Herodotus. & Godley, A. D., 1921, Herodotus, London (England) : New York (New York) : W. Heinemann ; G.P. Putnam's Sons
- Ivanova, M., 2013, “Domestic architecture in the Early Bronze Age of western Anatolia: the row-houses of Troy I”, Anatolian studies, 63, (pp17-33).
- Knox, M. O., 1973, “Megarons and ΜΕΓΑΡΑ: Homer and Archaeology”, The Classical Quarterly, 23(1), (pp.1-21).
- Korfmann, M., 1983, Demircihüyük: die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1975-1978, 1 [Textband]. Architektur, Stratigraphie und Befunde. von Zabern.
- Koob, S. P., Rogers, M. H., & Sams, G. K., 1990, “Preserving the eighth century BC Mud brick architecture at Gordion, Turkey: approaches to conservation”. In: 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture: Adobe 90 preprints: Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, October 14-19, 1990 (pp. 289-294). Getty Conservation Institute.
- Leick, G., 2002, A dictionary of ancient Near Eastern architecture: Routledge.
- Lloyd, S., & Mellaart, J., 1958, “Beycesultan Excavations: Fourth Preliminary Report, 1957”, Anatolian studies, 8, (pp.93-125).
- Mac Sweeney, N., 2011, Community identity and archaeology: dynamic communities at Aphrodisias and Beycesultan: University of Michigan Press.
- Matero, Frank G., 2011, “Resurrecting Place. Conservation as Interpretation and Display of a Phrygian Capital”, In: Gordion Awakened, eds. M. Keller and F.G. Matero, pp.26-47. Architectural Conservation Laboratory University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
- Mellink, M. J., & Angel, J. L., 1968, “Excavations at Karataş-Semayük in Lycia, 1967”, American Journal of Archaeology, (pp. 243-263)
- Ogilvie, M., & Harvey, J., 2003, The biographical dictionary of women in science: pioneering lives from ancient times to the mid-20th century: Routledge.
- Omura, S., 2011, “Kaman-Kalehöyük excavations in central Anatolia”, In: G. McMahon & S. Steadman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia: (10,000-323 BCE). USA: OUP. ( , pp. 1095e1111)
- Özgüç, T., 1963, “Early Anatolian archaeology in the light of recent research”, Anatolia, issue 7, (pp. 1-21).
- Özdoğan, M., 2003, “The Black Sea, the Sea of Marmara and Bronze Age archaeology: an archaeological predicament”, In: Troia and the Troad (pp. 105-120). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Roller, L. E., 2011, Incised Drawings from Early Phrygian Gordion: Gordion Special Studies IV (Vol. 130) : University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Rose, C. B., 2012, “Introduction”, In: The Archaeology of Phrygian Gordion, Royal City of Midas: Gordion Special Studies 7 (Vol. 7): University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Sagona, A., Zimansky, P., 2015, Ancient Turkey, Routledge Chapman & Hall, New York.
- Sarı, D., 2013, “The Cultural Development of Western Anatolia in the Third and Second Millennia B.C. and its Relationship with Migration Theories, Luwian Identities: Culture, Language, and Religion between Anatolia and the Aegean”, Culture and History of the Ancient Near East, 64, (pp305-327).
- Smith, E. B., 1942, “The megaron and its roof”, American Journal of Archaeology, 46(1), (pp 99-118).
- Summers, G. D., & Summers, F., 2010, “From picks to pixels: Eighty years of development in the tools of archaeological exploration and interpretation, 1927–2007, at Kerkenes Dag in central Turkey”, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden (pp. 669-683).
- Summers, G. D., Summers, F., & Branting, S., 2004, “Megarons and associated structures at Kerkenes Dağ: An interim report”, Anatolia Antiqua, 12(1), (pp.7-41).
- Todorova, H., 2003, Prehistory of Bulgaria, In Recent research in the prehistory of the Balkans, Grammenos, Demetrios V. eds., (257-317) Thessaloniki; Publications of the Archaeological Institute of Northern Greece; Archaeological Receipts Fund.
- Warner, J., 1979, “The Megaron and Apsidal House in Early Bronze Age Western Anatolia: New Evidence from Karatas”, American Journal of Archaeology New York, NY, 83(2), 133-147.
- Werner, K. , 1993, “The megaron during the Aegean and Anatolian bronze age” A Study of Occurrence, Shape, Architectural Adaption, and Function, SIMA, 108.
- Yakar, J., 1974, “The Twin Shrines of Beycesultan”, Anatolian Studies, 24, (pp151-161).
- Yakar, J., 2011, “Anatolian Chronology and Terminology”, In: S.R. Steadman, G. McMahon (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia 10,000-323 B.C.E. Oxford: (pp.56-93)
- Young, T. C., 1966, “Thoughts on the Architecture of Hasanlu IV”, Iranica Antiqua, 6, 48.
- Schachner, A., 2006, “Auf welchen Fundamenten? Überlegungen zum Stand der Erforschung der hethitischen Architektur”, In” Strukturerung und Datierung in der hethitischen Archäeologie/Structuring and Dating in Hittite Archaeology, ed. Dirk Paul Mielke, Ulf-Dietrich Schoop, and Jürgen Seeher, (pp.149–165). BYZAS 4. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları.
- Sarı, D., 2012, “İlk Tunç Çağı ve Orta Tunç Çağı’nda Batı Anadolu’nun Kültürel ve Siyasal Gelişimi”, Mimarlar, Arkeologlar, Sanat Tarihçileri, Restoratörler Ortak Platformu Edergi, 7, (pp.112-249).
پژوهش های باستان شناسی ایران
دوره 8، شماره 16 - شماره پیاپی 16
اردیبهشت 1397
صفحه 145-164

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار