A Glance at Some Common Alloys in the Islamic Period on the Basis of Texts an Archaeological Evidences

Authors

Abstract

Studying the alloys of Islamic period can significantly highly position recognizing the metallurgy of this period. Relevant terminology and recognizing inter-connected compositions have always of the challenges of Islamic period metallurgy. According to scientific texts of Islamic era, there some names of alloys which are unknown yet; the reason was that during that times varieties of science such as metallurgy and making alloys, pharmacy, chemistry and other science were related to alchemy. On one hand, many of alchemists were attempting to keep their secrets, therefore gradually this subject caused that manufacturing methods of some alloys being forgotten. Therefore from each of ancient sources can obtain a little knowledge about ancient metallurgy while this information is also contradictious. This problem in some cases as serious as that scientists such as Biruni were not informed on the some alloying methods during the time. Subject matter which scientists have not paid attention to and caused most of modern metallurgic researchers which have worked about Islamic  metallurgy, is to rely on some ancient sources caused many mistakes. For example, most of the researchers have mistaken three different alloys which written in Islamic sources namely ، “Sepīd-Rūy”,”Haft-jūsh” and “ Tālīghūn “. Experts take these three alloys as “white bronze”, the Copper alloy with high percent of tin; but it cannot be true and in present paper it is attempt to prove that “Sepīd-Rūy”,”Haft-jūsh” and “ Tālīghūn “ are different alloys as  merely “Sepid-Rūy” can be counted as “white bronze”. But if we want To clarify alloys of this period according to written sources and modern data, one should compare written records to new archaeological data, until can exactly be concluded; a subject is aimed by the current paper and on which basis some mistakes of Islamic metallurgy have reformed. Here,  in this study three current alloys and controversy named “Sepīd-Rūy”,”Haft-jūsh” and “ Tālīghūn”, which have disputed over a century, have studied exactely and comprehensively. On basis of carried out investigations, unlike the current idea these three alloys are diverse from each other as “Haft-jūsh” and “ Tālīghūn” cannot be counted as “white bronze” and “ Sepid-Rūy “ but the only alloy which can be identified as” White Bronze”. Additionally, surveying the scientific texts of Islamic period written on chemistry, many names of alloys have proved in this period which as yet have not studied. In some cases, results from new studies on the element analysis of the ancient metal-works, are proving accuracy on the ancient texts; but problem is that the researchers excluding Copper alloy whit high percent of tin which have named as “ White Bronze “, in the other cases have used the term “bronze”, whereas can by referring to the ancient texts and match them with metal works which have analyzed and present here, extract the correct names of alloys. For instance 2 alloys of this group namely, “Patrūy”, an alloy that made of copper and lead, and “Darārūy”, quadruplet alloy of copper, lead, tin, and zinc, are investigated for the first time, as new researches approve their existence. Western scientists knew “Darārūy” as quadruplet alloy but it is better known as its original label. 

Keywords


- آلن. ج، 1374، فلزکاری در هنرهای ایران، زیر نظر: ر. دبلیو فریه، ترجمه: پرویز مرزبان، نشرپژوهش فرزان روز.
- خلف تبریزی (برهان)، محمدبن حسین، 1342، برهان قاطع، با احتمام: محمد معین، جلد 2 و 4، چاپ دوم، امیر کبیر.
- دهخدا، علی‌اکبر، 1377، لغت‌نامه‌ی دهخدا، چاپ دوم، دانشگاه تهران.
- دیماند، ا، 1364، راهنمای صنایع اسلامی، ترجمه: عبدالله فریار، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
- رساله کیمیایی، نسخه خطی، کتابخانه ملی.
- زکریای‌رازی، محمدبن ابی بکر، 1342، کتاب سرالاسرار با تجارب شهریاری، به‌کوشش: محمدتقی دانش‌پژوه، کمیسیون ملی یونسکو در ایران، چاپخانه حیدری.
- سی‌گانتر، پل‌جت، 1382، فلزکاری ایران در دوره‌ی هخامنشی، اشکانی و ساسانی، ترجمه: شهرام حیدرآبادیان، گنجینه‌ی هنر.
- کاشانی، ابوالقاسم عبدالله، 1345، عرایس الجواهر و نفایس الاطایب، به کوشش: ایرج افشار، تهران، سلسله انتشارات انجمن آثار ملی.
- لک‌پور، سیمین، 1375، سفیدروی، سازمان میراث فرهنگی کشور
- ملیکان شیروانی، جیمز آلن، 1376، مدخل برنج (2)، دانش‌نامه جهان اسلام جلد (3)، ترجمه: پرخیده ملکی، زیر نظر: غلامعلی حداد‌عادل، تهران بنیاد دایره المعارف الاسلامی، 231-234.
- وارد، ریچارد، 1384، فلزکاری اسلامی، ترجمه: مهناز شایسته‌فر، انتشارات موسسه مطالعات هنر اسلامی.
- وولف، هانس. ای، 1372، صنایع‌دستی کهن ایران، ترجمه: دکتر سیروس ابراهیم‌زاده، انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
- بیرونی، ابوریحان، 1370، کتاب الصیدنه فی طب، به تصحیح: عباس زریاب، تهران؛ مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
- بیرونی، ابوریحان، 1374، الجماهرفی الجواهر، تحقیق: یوسف الهادی، تهران؛ وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، دفتر نشر میراث‌مکتوب، شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
 
- Aga-oglu, Mehmet,1944, A brief  Note  On Islamic  Terminology  for Bronz  and  Brass , Jornal  at  the American  Oriental  Society , Vol.54, 218-22
- Allan. J. W., 1977, Oniginaly in Bronz; A  Thirteenth Century Persian School of Metal  Workevs Iran ,vol.15, pp.156-159.
- Allan,,J. W., 1979, Persian Metal Tecnology.700-1300,Oxford .
- Baer, Eva, 1995, The dictionary of Art  Vol 16 . E.d by Jan Turner , Oxford University Press.
-.Craddock, 1979, the Copper Alloys of the Medieval Islamic Word-Inheritors of the Classical Tradition  ,World  Archaeogy ,vol.21, nol 1-68-79.
- Fehervari, Geza, 1976, Islamic  Metal work at the Eight to the Fifteenth Century in the Keir Collection , Faber and  Faber , Limited 3 Queen  Square Landan .
- Laufer. B., 1919, Sino – Iranica : Chinese contributions to the History of Civilisation in Ancient Iran.Chicago: fFild Museum of Natural History Publications, 15 no 3.
- Melikian – Chirvani ,Assudullah Souren, 1974, the White Bronzes af Early  Islamic Iran Metropolitan  Museum Jourral , Vol.9  PP-123- 151.
- Park.Jang-Sik  ,Dmitny Voyakin, 2009, the Key Vole of Zinc,Tin and Lead  in Copper –Base Objekts From Medieval  Talger  in  Kazakhstan, Jorral of Archaeologicall,  Scicnce 36 ,522-528.
-.Ruske .j., 1937, Al-Razi’s Buch Gehimniss der Geheimnisse,Berlin.
-. Wiedemann, E., 1905, ’’Auszuge  Aus  Arabichen Encyklopadien  And  Anderes, Beitrage v ,Erlangen 37.