An Investigation of Fire-Altar Typology in Central Asia from the 5th to the 8th Century A.D.

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran (Corresponding Author).

2 MA in Historical Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran.

10.22084/nb.2024.29594.2689

Abstract

Abstract
Fire worship stands as one of the most ancient beliefs in the early civilizations of the world. This practice likely originated in prehistoric societies and subsequently became integral to Zoroastrianism, evolving into a fundamental aspect of the faith. Archaeological evidence and linguistic analyses suggest that the roots of Zoroastrianism can be traced back to the second millennium B.C. in Central Asia. While precise details regarding the design of early Zoroastrian fire altars remain elusive, the emergence of fire temples and altars took on a more defined structure during the historical period, which coincided with the expansion of Zoroastrian beliefs. This research delves into the typology of fire-altars in Central Asia, with a particular emphasis on the formal developments of Zoroastrian fire-altars spanning the 5th to the 8th century A.D. The investigation raises two pertinent questions: What types of fire-altars were utilized in Central Asia during the period under consideration? Moreover, what formal changes did these fire-altars undergo from the 5th century A.D. to the onset of the Islamic era? To explore these questions, a descriptive-analytical approach has been adopted. The study further integrates archaeological evidence and comparative methodologies to effectively address the research inquiries. The findings of this study indicate that the fire-altars in Central Asia exhibited four distinct yet concurrent formal designs during the period from the 5th to the 8th centuries A.D.: 1) Parasol-shaped fire-altars, 2) Columned fire-altars, 3) Hourglass-shaped fire-altars, and 4) Schematized fire-altars. These structures typically featured a base, column, capital, and brazier, and were constructed in two varieties: portable and fixed. Furthermore, the embellishment of the fire-altars with a range of geometric, floral, and symbolic motifs not only highlights their aesthetic qualities but also suggests the presence of a spiritual environment, imparting a sense of vibrancy and life to the worshippers.
Keywords: Fire-altar, Central Asia, Zoroastrianism, The Historical Period, Early Islamic Centuries.
 
Introduction
Zoroastrianism ranks among one of the most ancient and enduring religions of the ancient world. While scholars specializing in Iranian studies have not reached a consensus on the origins of this Iranian faith, various dates have been suggested for its inception, ranging from the seventh millennium B.C. to the Achaemenid Period. Notably, evidence of Zoroastrian practices has been identified in Central Asia dating back to at least the first millennium B.C. Indicators such as Zoroastrian burial customs and the veneration of fire suggest the presence of this religion during that era in Central Asia. Initially, the sanctity of early Zoroastrian fire temples was determined by the presence of burning fire and vessels containing ashes; however, over time, fire-altars evolved into more structured forms, manifesting in diverse configurations throughout the historical period. The fire-altars in question were either unearthed through archaeological digs or illustrated on various artifacts such as containers, murals, sotōdāns, and funerary beds. The examined fire-altars exhibit a range of formal characteristics. In certain examples, the fire-altar features a conical base topped with a convex plate designed to hold the fire. Conversely, other fire-altars are characterized by columns and stepped plates at their lower levels. Additionally, another category of fire-altars comprises two conical structures stacked atop one another. Notably, some instances present unique designs, with their surfaces adorned with decorative motifs representing floral, faunal, and mythological themes. This research endeavors to analyze the morphology, typology, and development of Central Asian fire-altars from the late historical period through the early Islamic centuries, utilizing archaeological evidence as a foundation.
 
Typology of Central Asian Fire-Altars
An analysis of fire-altars in Central Asia, spanning the 5th to the 8th century A.D., has led to the identification of four distinct types. These fire-altars can be assessed through various criteria, including their form, discovery location, materials used, components, decorative elements, and whether they are designed to be fixed or portable. Based on their shapes, the fire-altars are categorized into four groups: 1) parasol-shaped, 2) columned, 3) hourglass-shaped, and 4) schematized. Some of these altars were uncovered during archaeological digs, while others are represented in artistic forms such as containers, murals, sotōdāns, and funerary beds. Although definitive conclusions regarding the medium of the depicted fire-altars cannot be drawn, it is evident that the fire-altar found at Ak-depe is constructed from clay, as confirmed by archaeological findings.
 
Conclusion
The veneration of fire represents one of the most ancient religious practices known in the ancient world. This tradition, originating in prehistoric times, later became a fundamental aspect of Zoroastrianism. While precise details regarding the inception of Zoroastrianism and the establishment of its initial fire temples and altars remain elusive, the advent of the historical era and the subsequent proliferation of Zoroastrianism led to the formalization and structuring of fire temples and altars. An analysis of fire altars from the 5th to the 8th century A.D. in Central Asia reveals that they can be categorized into four primary types: parasol-shaped, columned, hourglass-shaped, and schematized. This classification is based on the essential elements that constitute the fire altars, which include the base, column, capital, orb, horizontal plate, and brazier, all of which are critical components of Central Asian fire altars. Historically, these altars were utilized concurrently. This study illustrates the formal diversity of fire-altars in Central Asia during the period under examination. In terms of materials, the fire-altar at Ak-depe, which is made of clay, is the only example that can be definitively analyzed. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to hypothesize that some of the fire-altars in Central Asia, particularly the portable types, may have been constructed from either clay or metal. It is noteworthy that certain fire-altars in the region are stationary, like the one at Ak-depe, while others are mobile, as evidenced by the representation of a fire-altar on a silver vessel from Khwarezm, mural no. 7 in room no. 1 of Panjikent, and the funerary bed of Anyang. The ability to carry fire in portable fire-altars indicates the existence of mobile fire temples, which is a crucial element of Zoroastrianism in Central Asia. The fire-altar serves as a functional component within Zoroastrian fire temples; however, the intricate decorations adorning its surface highlight its aesthetic significance. These embellishments, which encompass a variety of geometric, floral, and symbolic designs, are meticulously carved into the base, column, capital, and brazier of the fire-altars, contributing to a spiritually enriching and vibrant atmosphere for both the sanctuary and its worshippers. A comprehensive analysis of the fire-altars in Central Asia reveals a diverse array of forms that were utilized concurrently over a span of at least four centuries. Despite variations in materials, structural characteristics, portability, and decorative elements, these fire-altars collectively underscore the enduring influence of Zoroastrianism and its religious manifestations in the region. When considered within a broader geographical framework that includes Iran and Central Asia, the extent and nature of cultural exchanges between these areas during the historical period become evident.

Keywords

Main Subjects


- Askarov, A. A., (1982). “Raskopki Pshaktepa na juge Uzbekistana”. Istorija Material’noj Kul’tury Uzbekistana, 17: 30-41.
- Belenitski, A. M. & Marshak B. I., (1971). “L’art de Piandjikent à la lumière des dernières fouilles (1958-1968)”. Arts Asiatiques, 23: 3-39. https://doi.org/10.3406/arasi.1971.1026
- Bendezu-Sarmiento, J. & Lhuilier, J., (2015). “Sinesepulchrocultural complex of Transoxiana (between 1500 and the middle of the 1st millenium BC) Funerary practices of the Iron Age in Southern Central Asia: recent work, old data, and new hypotheses”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 45 (2013): 283–317.
- Bogomolov, G. I. & Berdimurodov, A. E., (2017). “Uzbekistan. Rukovoditel’ proyekta; Pak. P: Religii Sredney Azii i Azerbaydzhana. Tom II. Zoroastrizm i Berovaniya Mazdaistskogo Kruga”. Samarkand: MITSAI, (308), 167-280.
- Boyce, M., (1975). A History of Zoroastrianism. Vol. 1, The Early Period. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004294004
- Cheng, B., (2010). “The Space Between Locating “Culture” in Artistic Exchange”. Edited by: Canepa. M. P: Theorizing Cross-Cultural Interaction. Among the Ancient and Early Medieval Mediterranean, Near East and Asia.volume 38, United States of America. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C: 81-119.
- Filanovich. M. I., (1978). “Bashneobraznyye kul’tovyye kuril’nitsy iz Merva”. Trudy YUTAKE. T. XVI. Materialy po arkheologii Merva, Ashkhabad: Ylym, 31-43
- Francfort, H. P., (2001). “The cultures with painted ceramics ofsouth Central Asia and their relations with the northeastern steppe zone (late 2nd–early 1st millennium BC)”. In: R. Eichmann & H. Parzinger (Hrsg.), Migration und Kulturtransfer. Der Wandel vorder- und zentralasiatischerKulturen im Umbruch vom 2. zum 1. vorchristlichen Jahrtausend. Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums Berlin 23. bis 26. November 1999. Bonn: 221–235.
- Gaibov, V. A. & Koshelenko, I. G. A., (2014). “Khramy ognya Ha Territorii Yuzhnogo Turkmenistana”. izd; Belyayev. L.A., Russkaya arkheologiya, (1): 124-132.
- Gnoli, G., (1980). Zoroaster’s time and homeland: a study on the origins of Mazdeism and related problems. Naples: Istituto University oriental‬.
- Goryacheva, V. D., (2017). “Kyrgyzstan”. Rukovoditel’ proyekta: Pak. P., Religii Sredney Azii i Azerbaydzhana. Tom II. Zoroastrizm i Berovaniya Mazdaistskogo Kruga. Samarkand: MITSAI, (308): 76-134.
- Grenet, F. & Azarnouche, S., (2007), “Where are the Sogdian Magi?”. cnrs / practical school of advanced studies, paris; research assistant, college of france: 159–179.
- Grenet, F., (2007). “Religious diversity among sogdian merchants in sixth-century china: Zoroastrianism, buddism, Manichaeism, and Hinduism”. Comparative Studies of Asia, Africa and Middle East, Vol. 27. No. 2. By Dake University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-2007-017
- Grenet, F., (2015). “Zoroastrianism in Central Asia”. In: M. Stausberg & Y. S.-D. Vevaina (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to Zoroastrianism. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell: 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785539.ch8
- Grenet. F., (1996). “Crise Et Sortie De Crise En Bactriane-Sogdiane Aux IV-V”. Siѐcles: De L’heritage Antique Àl’adoption De Modele Sassanides. Roma Accademia Nazionale Dei Lincei 127.
- Grenet. F., (2002). Zoroastrian Themes on Early Medieval Sogdian Ossuaries. Published in the United States of America in by Grantha Corporation.
- Hertel, J., (1924). Die Zeit Zoroasters. Leipzig.
- Herzfeld, E., (1938). “The Traditional date of Zoroaster”. In: Oriental studies in honour of C. E. P. Pavry, Edited by Cursetji Erachji Parvy, London: Oxford University Press: 132-136.
- Joglekar, P. P., (1998). “A preliminary report on the faunal remainsat Takhirbaj 1, Turkmenistan”. In: A. Gubaev, G. A. Koshelenko, M. Tosi (Ed.), The Archaeological Map of the Murghab delta. Preliminary reports 1990–95, Reports and Memoirs Series Minor Volume III. Rome, IsIAO: 115–118.
- Kaim, B., (2004). Ancient Fire Temples In The Light Of The Discovery At Mele Hairam”. Iranica Antiqua, 39: 323-337. https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.39.0.503900
- Kstrov, P. I., (1954). Zhivopis’ drevnego Pendzhikenta. Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Moskva.
- Lecomte, O., (2005). “The Iron Age of Northern Hyrcania”. IranicaAntiqua, XL: 461–478. https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.40.0.583222
- Lerner, J. A., 2005, “Aspects Of Assimilation: The Funerary Practices And Furnishings Of Central Asians In China”, Sino-Platonic Papers, 168: 1-69.
- Marshak, B., (1990). “Les fouilles de Pendjikent”. In: Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres,134 (1): 286-313. https://doi.org/10.3406/crai.1990.14842
- Marshak, B., (2001). “La thématique sogdienne dans l’art de la Chine de la seconde moitié du VIe siècle”. In: Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 145 (1): 227-264. https://doi.org/10.3406/crai.2001.16256
- Müller, Sh., (2008). “Sogdier in China um 600 n”. Chr. Nachrichten der Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens, Hamburg, (183-184): 117-148.
- Naymark. A. I., (1995). “O nachale mednoy chekanki v Bukharskom Sogde [On the Beginning of Copper Coinage in Bukharan Soghd]”. izd; Rtveladze. E.V., Numizmatika Tsentral’noy Azii I. Tashkent: 29-50.
- Riboud. P., (2007). “Bird Priests in Central Asian Tombs of 6th-Century China and Their Significance in the Funerary Realm”. Asia Institute, Paris: 21: 1-23.
- Sarianidi, V. I., (1989). Hram i nekropol’ Tilljatepe. Moscow: Nauka.
- Settegast, M., (2005). When Zarathustra Spoke: The Reformation of Neolithic Culture And Religion. Costa Mesa: Mazda Pub.
- Shenkar, M., (2017). “The Religion And The Pantheon Of The Sogdians (5TH–8TH Centuries CE) In Light oF Their Sociopolitical Structures”. Journal Asiatique. 305 (2): 191-209.
- Shishkin, V. A., (1963). Varakhsha. Akademiya nauk Uzbekskoy SSR Institutsional’naya istoriya arkheologii, Moskva.
- Škoda,V. G., (1985). “Ob odnoy gruppe sredneaziatskikh altarey ognya V-VIII vekov”. Nauchnyy redaktor: V. G. Lukonin: Khudozhestvennyye pamyatniki i problemy kul’tury Vostoka. L: Iskusstvo: 82-89.
- Smirnov, YA. I., (1909). Vostochnoye serebro. Atlas drevney serebryanoy i zolotoy posudy vostochnogo proiskhozhdeniya, naydennoy preimushchestvenno v predelakh Rossiyskoy imperii. Arkheologicheskoy Komissii ko dnyu 50-letiya yeyo deyatel’nosti. S. Peterburg.
- Wagner, M., (2014). “Yaz II Period on Topaz Gala Depe, Southern Turkmenistan”. In: Proceedingsofthe 8th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, Vol. 2, Edited by: Piotr Bielinski, Michal Gawlikowski, Rafal Kolinski, Dorota Lawecka, Arkadiusz Soltysiak, Zuzanna Wygnanska, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag: 519-528.