Signs to Scripts: Cultural Evolution and Visual Transformation of the Proto-Elamite Writing System

Author

M.A. in Archaeology, Independent Researcher, Iran.

Abstract

This study develops a heuristic cultural-evolutionary framework to trace the visual transformation of the Elamite writing system (ca. 3500–1850 BCE), emphasizing how evolving signs and artistic styles co-shaped the emergence, stabilization, and regional diversification of early writing systems. Grounded in cultural evolution theory, the research examines the Proto-Iranian writing sequence, encompassing Proto-Elamite and Linear Elamite as reconceptualized by Desset. Co-evolving stylistic trajectories are traced from representational motifs to increasingly abstract linear forms. A corpus of approximately 400 artefacts was systematically coded using analytically defined graded variables capturing pictoriality-abstraction, motif-script integration, stylistic complexity, and overall compositional geometry, enabling a detailed assessment of cultural dynamics and temporal patterns. Manually generated heuristic cultural-evolutionary reconstructions visualize directional patterns of change, highlighting continuity, divergence, experimentation, and innovation without asserting discrete clades or formal homologies. Findings demonstrate that iterative engagement with visual signs structured variation, transmission, and selective retention, while artistic styles actively mediated abstraction, spatial standardization, and compositional integration in writing. Integrating Material Engagement Theory (MET), this study emphasizes the distributed and entangled nature of cognition, showing how repeated interactions with clay tablets, seals, and other artefacts distributed memory and structured knowledge across mind, body, environment, and social practice. MET provides a conceptual lens for understanding how material engagement both scaffolds cognitive processes and actively shapes cultural evolution, facilitating individual learning, apprenticeship, and population-level transmission of stylistic and scriptural conventions over extended temporal and spatial scales. While material engagement and artistic conventions played a central role, administrative and socio-economic constraints simultaneously shaped the evolution of writing, functioning as integral components within the mind/brain-body-environment nexus. By operationalizing graded variables through a heuristic framework, this research offers a theoretically rigorous yet flexible methodology for studying early writing systems under comparable archaeological and stylistic conditions, highlighting the reciprocal influence of cognition, culture, and material engagement in the co-evolution of writing and visual style across diverse contexts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

- Álvarez-Mon, J., (2020). The art of Elam ca. 4200–525 BC. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018254
- Algaze, G., (2008). Ancient Mesopotamia at the dawn of civilization: The evolution of an urban landscape. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226013787.001.0001
- Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J., (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
- Cooper, J. S., (2004). “Babylonian beginnings”. In: S. D. Houston (Ed.), The first writing: Script invention as history and process (pp. 71–99). Cambridge University Press.
- Dahl, J. L., (2009). “Early writing in Iran”. In: C. Woods (Ed.), Visible language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East and beyond (pp. 145–155). Oriental Institute Museum Publications.
- Desset, F., (2016). “Proto-Elamite writing in Iran”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 48: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3406/arnil.2016.1104
- Desset, F. (2025). Personal Communication.
- Desset, F., (2017). Here ends the history of Elam: Toponomy, linguistics and cultural identity in Susa and south-western Iran, ca. 2400–1800 B.C. Ugarit-Verlag.
- Desset, F., (2021). “Considerations on the history of writing on the Iranian Plateau (ca. 3500–1850 B.C.)”. Journal of Archaeology and Archaeometry, 1(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30495/JAA.2022.694354
- Farsi, M. & Hoseinzadeh Sadati, J., (2025). “The fluidity of mind: The role of material culture as a mnemonic tool”. Journal of Archaeology of Iran. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Journal/aoi/Article/1205597
- Fenici, M. & Garofoli, D., (2017). The biocultural emergence of mindreading: Cognitive archaeology and human development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-017-0008-0
- Garofoli, D., (2016). “Cognitive archaeology and the evolution of mind”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(3): 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000168
- Henrich, J., (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873296
- Henrich, J. & Boyd, R., (2002). “On modeling cognition and culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations”. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2(2): 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853702320281836
- Houkes, W., (2011). “Cultural phylogenetics and the emergence of design”. In: P. E. Vermaas et al. (Eds.), Artefact kinds: Ontology and the human-made world (pp. 135–152). Springer.
- Lewens, T., (2024). Cultural selection. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009539043
- Malafouris, L., (2004). “The cognitive basis of material engagement: Where brain, body and culture conflate”. In: E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 53–62). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
- Malafouris, L., (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
- Malafouris, L., (2019). “Mind and material engagement”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7
- Malafouris, L. & Renfrew, C., (2010). Archaeology, material engagement and the extended mind. In The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
- Mann, M., (1986). The sources of social power, Vol. 1: A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570896
- Matthews, R. & Fazeli Nashli, H., (2022). The archaeology of Iran: From the Palaeolithic to the Achaemenid Empire. University of Reading Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224129
- Mesoudi, A., (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001
- Mesoudi, A., (2016). “Cultural evolution: A review of theory, findings, and applications”. Evolutionary Biology, 43(4): 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9320-0
- O’Brien, M. J. & Lyman, R. L., (2009). Seriation, stratigraphy, and index fossils: The backbone of archaeological dating. Springer.
- Overmann, K. A., (2016). “Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the ancient Near East”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000019
- Potts, D. T., (2004). “Foundation texts and new research opportunities”. In: H. Crawford (Ed.), The Sumerian world (pp. 241–254). Routledge.
- Renfrew, C., (2004). “Towards a theory of material engagement”. In: E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 23–32). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
- Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R., (2004). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001
- Schmandt-Besserat, D., (2007). When writing met art: From symbol to story. University of Texas Press.
- Straffon, L. M., (2019). “Evolution and origins of visual art: An archaeological perspective”. In: A. M. Prentiss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary research in archaeology (pp. 319–338). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11117-5_16
- Temkin, I., (2016). “Homology and phylogenetic inference in biological and material cultural evolution”. Biological Theory, 11(4): 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0246-7
- Whiten, A., Hinde, R. A., Laland, K. N. & Stringer, C. B., (2011). “Culture evolves”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567): 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0372
- Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F. L., (2017). Cognitive models in Palaeolithic archaeology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204112.001.0001
Archaeological Research of Iran
Volume 15, Issue 47
English Issue
2026
Pages 111-137

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics