Explaining of the Concepts and Social Symbols (Social Structure) of the Iron Age Societies; Case Study: Tabriz Blue Mosque Cemetery

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. in Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Graduate of Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Graduate of Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Social Archaeology is a branch of Archaeology that discusses on data from the perspective of sociology, and studies the structure of past societies and their evolutionary process. In the Iron Age, due to the prevalence of the cemeteries in most parts of Iran, discussions about the kind of community, beliefs and religion of the people of that societies are also gaining strength. In these cemeteries, the structure of the graves and objects inside them (grave goods) has concepts and symbols that can resolve some of the existing confusion about the culture of the peoples of the Iron Age. The cemetery of Blue Mosque (locally called Göy Meçid or Kabood Mosque) is one of the most important of these cemeteries. The objects which obtained from this cemetery graves due to the variety in type and the difference in theire Abundance, represent the social distinctions of buried persons. Comparison of the structure of graves and of the graves goods indicated that some of them have more valuable and objects than other graves, and as a result their social status is high, while in some graves no objects have been placed. Based on these cases, they can indicated to socially ranked and referred to the criteria used to determine the rank of individuals in their lifetime.
Keywords: Iron Age, Blue Mosque Cemetery, Concepts and Symbols, Social Rankings.
 
Introduction
One of the ways to identify the social status of individuals is to study the physical remains of humans, including their skeleton and the objects buried with them. The present research, which is aimed at analyzing the burial patterns in the cemetery of the Blue Mosque of Tabriz, seeks to answer the following question: What are the indications for the existence of a ranking system or social classes in the Iron Age cemetery of the Blue Mosque of Tabriz? The hypothesis raised in relation to the above question is that the differences in the architectural structure of the graves in terms of form and materials, diversity and multiplicity of objects and their arrangement within the graves are indications for the relative classification of social ranks in this cemetery. The research method in this study was a field study in the first place, and in the second place, it has been attempted to study the collection by a descriptive-statistical method based on the collected and documented data obtained from the first stage as well as library sources. And then, with a social archeology approach, it was attempted to answer the research question that defines the social classes in the cemetery of the Blue Mosque.
 
Theoretical Foundations of the Research
Social archeology is a branch of archeology that studies the social structure and organization of past societies and their evolutionary process. Social archeology examines how social and political structures are formed from basic units such as clan and group. Social groups and classes exhibit different attitudes and behaviors with regard to people’s age, class type, gender, wealth, power and social status that these behaviors undergo changes in the evolutionary process of society (Grant & et al. 2002: 236).  
The most important and common models and methods for reconstruction of social structure can be stated as follows:
1- Reconstruction of the social structure based on settlement sites, residences and architectural remains.
2- Reconstruction of the social structure based on the remaining objects, tools, and artifacts.
3- Reconstruction of the social structure based on graves, burial methods, contents of the graves and materials.
Reconstruction of the social structure according to study, examination and inference based on burial patterns and contents of graves is a method that is considered in almost all schools of archeology despite differences in the type of inference (Yadollahi, 2004: 20).  
In this method, anthropologists consider burial features such as objects inside or around the graves, the shape or size of the tombs, the general design or location of the cemetery; and then accordingly, the social class or status of those who are buried is taken into account. Therefore, the location of the graves, the objects inside the graves, the pre-funeral rituals and abundant types of burials all imply the differences existing in a society (Pollock 1999: 206). In determining the class or ranking of individuals, the role of the quantity and quality of objects inside the graves as well as their possible role in determining social hierarchy should also be taken into account. In this context, the material of the objects, abundance or scarcity of the materials that the objects are made of, and the time it takes to construct the objects must be considered (Dark, 2000: 117). 
 
The Cemetery of the Blue Mosque of Tabriz
The Iron Age cemetery of the Blue Mosque of Tabriz is located in the old texture of Tabriz city which was discovered in 1997 by accident and after construction activities. The area of this site is estimated to be 28290 square meters. According to the study of the structure and status of the objects within the graves, it can be concluded that various factors have been implicated in different burial methods, the most important of which are: the development of burial traditions in different eras, the age, gender, and social status of individuals and so on.
In terms of structure and architecture, the graves are divided into three groups: 1. Simple pit-shape graves 2- Graves with a horseshoe structure (made of stone, adobe and clay wall). 3- Graves with adobe structures exclusively for children (Hejebri Nobari, 2001: 5). All skeletons are buried as embryos or with a squatted gesture and the bodies and faces of the corpses are placed in different directions. Next to the corpses, a variety of funeral gifts, including 511 pottery wares, 397 metal objects, and about 2000 stone beads, have been obtained.
 
Conclusion
The most important method that can be used to investigate the social status of individuals based on burial in the cemetery of the Blue Mosque of Tabriz is to consider the quantity and quality of burial objects, in such a way that those burials which are rich in terms of objects are often regarded as the graves of wealthy individuals with a superior social base.
In this cemetery, there is not a significant relationship between the structure of the graves and the status of the people, and one cannot discern the difference of the individuals’ position according to the structure and dimensions of the graves. 
In the cemetery of the Blue Mosque, women, like men, had equal privileges based on the quantity and quality of the burial objects. Therefore, we are faced with a society in which women have the same social privilege as men, and perhaps they have been higher than men. In some cases, objects such as bronze daggers or arrows are seen in the graves of women just like men, perhaps indicating their role in the society or their special status in relation to others and these objects may have been placed in their graves in order to protect them. Children and infants in this site have had the privilege of being buried with objects as adults.
 
 

Keywords


- آجورلو، بهرام، 1382، «مقدمه‌ای بر پیدایش باستان‌شناسی اجتماعی». باستان‌پژوهی، سال 5، شمارۀ 11، صص:صص: 17-20.
- دارک، کن. آر، 1379، مبانی نظری باستان‌شناسی. ترجمۀ کامیار عبدی، تهران: نشر مرکز دانشگاهی.
- سوین، ولی، 1388، راهنمای روش کاوش باستان‌شناسی. ترجمۀ بهرام آجورلو، نشر سیمای دانش.
- شیفر، مایکل، 1385، «ساختار نظریه‌های باستان‌شناسی». ترجمۀ کامیار عبدی، باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، سال 21، شمارۀ 28،‌صص: صص: 5-29.
- طلایی، حسن، 1387، عصر آهن ایران. تهران: سمت.
- فاگان، برایان، 1381، سرآغاز؛ درآمدی بر باستان‌شناسی (اصول، مبانی و روش‌ها). ترجمۀ غلامعلی شاملو، جلد دوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
- گرین، کوین، 1383، مقدمه‌ای بر باستان‌شناسی. ترجمۀ فرهنگ خادمی‌ندوشن و فروزنده جعفرزاده‌پور، تهران: نشر دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
- مختاری‌پور، فاطمه، 1394، «تحلیل الگوهای تدفین در شمال و شمال‌غرب ایران به‌منظور بررسی طبقات اجتماعی عصرآهن این مناطق براساس مطالعۀ موردی گورستان مسجد کبود تبریز». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس، تهران، (منتشر نشده).
- ملازاده، کاظم، 1394، «تأثیر کاربرد ساخته‌های آهنی در پیشرفت تکنولوژی و تحولات اجتماعی و اقتصادی جوامع عصر آهن پایانی (با تأکید بر غرب و شمال‌غرب ایران)». جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی، دورۀ 7، شمارۀ 1، صص: 205-225.‎
- هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا؛ و صالحی گروسی، مهناز، 1384، «هنر سفالگری عصر آهن در گورستان مسجد کبود تبریز». مجلۀ پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی و مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای، شمارۀ 1، صص: 38-30.
- هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، 1379، «گزارش مقدماتی دومین فصل کاوش در محوطۀ باستانی مسجد کبود تبریز». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی و مرکز تحقیقات باستان‌شناسی دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس، (منتشر نشده).
- هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، 1380، «گزارش سومین فصل کاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ باستانی مسجد کبود تبریز». پژوهش مشترک دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس و سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).           
- هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، 1381، «گزارش چهارمین فصل کاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ باستانی مسجد کبود تبریز». پژوهش مشترک دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس و سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
- هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، 1382، «گزارش پنجمین فصل کاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ باستانی مسجد کبود تبریز». پژوهش مشترک دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس و سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
- هول، فرانک، 1385، باستان‌شناسی غرب ایران. ترجمۀ زهرا بایستی، تهران: نشر سمت.
- یداللهی، سیما، 1383، «باستان‌شناسی اجتماعی؛ نگاهی به شیوه‌های بازسازی». مجلۀ باستان‌پژوهی، شمارۀ 12، صص: 25-16.
 
- Brown, T. B., 1951,  Excavation in Azerbaijan, 1948. John Murrary, London.
- Burney, C., 1962, “The Excavation at Yanik Tepe, Azerbaijan, 1961, Second Preliminary Report”. Iraq, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, Pp: 134-151.
- Danti, M. D., 2013, “The Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in North western Iran”. In: Daniel T. Potts, Ed. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran, New York: Oxford University Press, Pp: 327-376.
- Dyson, R. H., 1989, “Rediscovering Hasanlu”. Expedition, Vol. 31, Nos 2-3, Pp: 3-127.
- Dyson, R. H., 1989. “The Iron Age Architecture at Hasanlu:  An Essay”. Expedition 31, Nos, 2-3, Pp: 107-127.
- Grant, J.; Gorin, S. & Feleming, N., 2002, The Archaeology Coursebook. Routledge, London.
- Hodder, I., 2004, The post prossual reaction in: theory and practice in archaeology. Published by Taylor and francis e-library.
- Lippert, A., 1979, “Die Osterrichischen Ausgrabunyen Am Kordlar Tepe In Persisch West Aserbeidschan (1971-1978)”. AMI, Band 12, Pp: 104 -137.
- Muscarella, O. W., 1974, “The Iron Age At Dinkha Tepe, Iran”. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 9, Pp: 35-90.
- Muscarella, O. W., 1989, “Excavation at Dinkha Tepe, 1966”. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 3, Pp: 187-196.
- Parker P. M., 1999, The archaeology of death and burial. Texas University, press college station.
- Pollock, S., 1999, Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that never was.Cambridge University Press.
- Redman, C., 1978, “Multivariate Artifact Analysis: A Basis for Multidimensional Interpretations”. In: C. Redman et al, eds., Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating, Pp: 159-192, New York: Academic Press.
- Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P., 1991, Archaeology and Theories Methods Practice. Thames and Hodson London.
- Shanks, M. & Christopher, T., 1987, Re- constructing Archaeology:  Theory & Practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Trigger, B. C., 2007, “Cultural comparision and archaeological theory, in: a companition to social archaeology”. Ede by: Lynn meskell and Robert W. Preucel, Black well publishing, Pp: 46-59.
- Young, T. C. Jr., 1965, “A Camparative Ceramic Choronology For Western Iran, 1500-500 B.C”. Iran, No. 3, Pp: 53-86.