Classification and Typology of Pottery of the Parthian Cemetery of Veliran, Damavand

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of historical period Archaeology Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, RICHT Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).

2 Ph.D. in Archaeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22084/nb.2025.30303.2737

Abstract

Abstract
The pottery of the Parthian Empire exhibited considerable variation throughout its extensive territory, resulting in several unique cultural regions. A significant archaeological site in Iranian Central Plateau is Veliran, which underwent exploration during two seasons in 2006 and 2007. Among the primary cultural artifacts discovered at this location, especially from its burial sites and particularly the cellar grave were both intact vessels and potsherds. This study is fundamentally oriented and employs a descriptive-analytical methodology. The approach integrates library research with field investigations. The principal aim of the study is to perform both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the Parthian pottery unearthed at Veliran. This encompasses the classification and typology of the ceramics, along with the establishment of their relative chronology. Consequently, this research aims to evaluate the morphology of Veliran pottery and, by comparing it with analogous examples, to establish a model that characterizes Parthian pottery within Iranian Central Plateau. The typological analysis is designed to identify the distribution patterns of Parthian ceramics in this area this constitutes the primary inquiry of the study. The results of the research reveal that the predominant types of pottery unearthed during the two excavation seasons at the Veliran Parthian cemetery comprise rhytons, pilgrim flasks, cups, oil lamps, bowls, jugs, measuring vessels, plates, chalices, and carafes. Based on these comparisons, the cultural sphere of Veliran shows the greatest similarities with the western, northeastern, and northern regions of Iran, respectively. In particular, its ceramic assemblage closely aligns with that of the Parthian sites at Qumis, Qaleh-I Yazdigird, and the Bisutun cemetery. Accordingly, the Veliran cemetery may be considered a significant Parthian site within the Damavand region, reflecting the ceramic traditions characteristic of this historical period.
Keywords: Classification, Typology, Pottery, Parthian Cemetery of Veliran, Damavand.
 
Introduction
Two seasons of excavation and investigation on the eastern hills of the Tar River, near the village of Veliran in Damavand County, led to the identification of a significant archaeological site dating to the Parthian and Sasanian periods. The site yielded a diverse array of cultural materials that are considered unique within the Iranian context. Excavations uncovered numerous cultural features and artifacts, including four human burials, bone remains, potsherds, metal objects, glass fragments, coins, wood, and architectural remains. Given the central role of pottery in the study of cultural interactions and chronology, this paper focuses on the classification and typological analysis of the Parthian ceramics recovered from the Veliran cemetery.
The primary research questions addressed in this study are as follows:
1. To which chronological phase of the Parthian period does the ceramic assemblage from the Veliran belong? 2. With which cultural regions do the pottery from Veliran demonstrate affinities? 3. What are the prevalent pottery types within the Veliran assemblage and their associated technological characteristics?
Based on archaeological evidence and comparative analysis, the examined ceramics are attributed to the middle phase of the Parthian period. The presence of clinky ware, a type characteristic of Parthian period in western Iran [specifically northwestern Iran?], suggests cultural connections between Iranian Central Plateau and western regions of Iran. The studied pottery assemblage consists predominantly of plain, unglazed vessels. The predominant forms include rhyton (takuk), cup, pilgrim flask, oil lamp, bowl, jar, measuring vessel, plate, carafe, and chalice.
Research data were collected through library research and fieldwork, followed by qualitative analysis. Field activities comprised archaeological excavation, followed by processing and documentation of ceramic samples: washing, registration of sample information, selection of diagnostic specimens, illustration, and photography. Subsequently, the typological results were compared with analogous studies of Parthian ceramics from other ancient sites, enabling the relative dating of this ceramic assemblage.
 
Discussion
The historical site of Veliran is positioned approximately 500 meters south of the village of Veliran, at the base of the hillside that marks the boundary between the villages of Veliran and Shalambeh. During two seasons of excavation at the Veliran site, archaeologists uncovered the remains of a small Sassanid castle, which measures 40×50 meters and is oriented from east to west. Within the Sassanid substratum, a cemetery dating back to the Parthian period was identified, featuring four types of graves that demonstrate different burial practices: 1) cellar (underground), 2) burning, 3) pit graves, and 4) stone graves. Among the cultural artifacts retrieved from these graves are both complete and fragmented pottery vessels; the technical features of these vessels will be scrutinized in the following stage of research. The most significant discovery from here consists of intact vessels and a limited number of pottery sherds. These ceramics were primarily found in a cellar grave within Trench O17, with an additional sample coming from a pit grave in Trench L13. The recovered pottery collection includes forms such as rhyton, cup, pilgrim flask, drinking cup, oil lamp, bowl, jar, measure ware, plate, carafe, chalice, and bead. In the initial phase of analysis, these pottery specimens are classified into two groups: closed-form and open-form vessels. The closed-form pottery from Veliran consists of pilgrim flasks, jars, carafes, cups, and rhytons. The open-form pottery includes oil lamps, bowls, drinking cups, chalices, and plates.
Regardless of the different types of pottery, there are several overarching characteristics. The pottery artifacts investigated in the Veliran cemetery consist of plain and decorated types. Some of these artifacts feature burnished surfaces while others show carved, added, and painted (geometric) motifs. The paste of these pottery items is characterized as buff, light reddish buff, red, brick red, scarlet, and gray hues. The ceramics examined were both wheel-made and hand-made, with certain fragments produced through a hybrid method that combines wheel-making and handcrafting, incorporating sand to enhance their durability. Most of the ceramics underwent adequate firing processes, resulting in high durability; nevertheless, in some instances, the firing temperature was insufficient, resulting in a blackened core within the pottery.
 
Conclusion
A comparative analysis of the pottery from the Parthian cemetery at Veliran reveals notable similarities in certain shapes with those found at Parthian sites in adjacent regions, including the Central Plateau (Kohan, Shemiran, and archaeological surveys of the Bueen Zahra Plain), northern Iran (Kelardasht, Dailaman, ShahPir, Noruzmahale), northeastern Iran (Tureng Tepe, Yarim Tepe, Shahr Tepe, Dargaz, Qumis, and archaeological survey of Damghan Plain), as well as the western and northwestern parts of Iran (Qaleh-I Yazdigird, Laodike Temple, Kangavar, Bisutun, Mahneshan, Sang-e Shir, Nush-I Jan, Ardabil, and archaeological surveys of the Qorveh Plain in Kurdistan), the southwestern region of Iran (Susa, Choga Mish, Masdjid-i Solaiman, Dastova, Shushtar), and even extending beyond the current borders of Iran (Nisa, Seleucia, Dura Europos, Uruk, Shamlu, Ashdod, Dijiran). Overall, the findings from the typological and comparative chronological analyses of the pottery samples from the Parthian cemetery at Veliran distinctly illustrate the resemblance of these samples to the pottery from adjacent and trans-regional areas. This resemblance is particularly pronounced with the regions of ‘western Iran’, ‘northeast Iran’, and ‘northern Iran’, as well as among the sites such as Qumis (Semnan Province), Qaleh-I Yazdigird, and the Bisutun Parthian cemetery (Kermanshah Province). Consequently, the Veliran Cemetery can be regarded as one of the Parthian sites within the Damavand region, showcasing pottery traditions from this era. However, in terms of technical attributes, there are limited similarities with the aforementioned cultural spheres. This suggests that there were connections between Veliran and the sites in these regions, indicating cultural interactions. Nonetheless, it is essential to consider the differences, innovations, and the influence of local factors on the ordinary pottery of the Veliran cemetery. Therefore, it appears that the ordinary pottery types from the Veliran site possess indigenous characteristics and are classified as local varieties produced in local kilns, while their shapes remain comparable to those from other cultural sites. Overall, the findings from the study and classification of pottery, along with their comparison to pottery from other archaeological sites and the dating of cultural regions, indicate that the pottery discovered at the Veliran cemetery in Damavand is associated with the mid-Parthian period. This conclusion is supported by additional artifacts unearthed from the same cemetery, which include Parthian coins attributed to Mithradates II (123-88 BCE), Phraat III (57.58-70 BCE), Mithradates III (54-57 BCE), Orodes I (80-90 BCE), and Orodes II (38-57 BCE).

Keywords

Main Subjects


- افشــاری، لیــلا؛ و نقشــینه، امیرصــادق، (1393). «توصیــف، طبقه‌بنــدی و تحلیــل گونه‌شــناختی سـفال‌های دورۀ اشـکانی گورسـتان سنگ‌شـیر همـدان». پژوهش‌هـای باستان‌شناسـی ایـران، 4 (7): 132-113.  https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_991.html
- امیرلـو، عنایـت‌الله، (1369). «کاوش در دماونـد». باستا‌‌ن‌شناسـی و تاریـخ، 5 (8-9): 90. 
- پازوکی‌طــرودی، ناصــر، (1381). آثار تاریخــی دماونــد. تهــران: اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی اســتان تهــران.
- پازوکی‌طــرودی، ناصــر، (1381). معرفــی اجمالــی دماونــد و فهرســت آثــار تاریخــی - فرهنگــی آن. تهــران: اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی اســتان تهــران.
- توحیدی، فائق، (1377). «بررسی هنری و کاربردی ظروفی به‌نام ریتون (ساغر) در هنر ایران». مجلۀ موزه‌ها، 20: 47-24.
- توحیـدی، فائـق؛ و طباطبایـی، محیط، (بی‌تـا). «گـزارش بررسـی‌های اسـتان تهـران، آبسـرد دماونـد». تهران: مرکـز اسـناد و مـدارک فرهنگـی (منتشـر نشـده).
- چایچی‌امیرخیز، احمد؛ و سعیدی‌هرسینی، محمدرضا، (1381). نگاهی به تدفین تابوتی در ایران‌باستان. تهران: سمیرا.
- خسروزاده، علیرضا؛ و عالی، ابوالفضل، (1383). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل گونه‌شناختی سفال‌های دوران اشکانی و ساسانی منطقه ماه‌نشان (زنجان)». در: کتاب مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
- ســرافراز، علی‌اکبــر، (1340). «گــزارش بررســی‌های اســتان تهــران، تپه‌هــای اطــراف دماونـد». تهران: مرکـز اسـناد و مـدارک فرهنگـی (منتشـر نشـده).
- صــراف، محمد رحیــم، (1361). «گــزارش بررســی‌های اســتان تهــران، گــردتپــۀ دماونــد». تهران: مرکــز اســناد و مــدارک فرهنگــی (منتشــر نشــده).
- رهبر، مهدی؛ و علی‌بیگی، سجاد، (1390). «گزارش یژوهش‌های باستان‌شناختی به‌منظور مکان‌یابی لائودیسه در نهاوند». پیام باستان‌شناس، 8 (15): 160-133. 
- طلایی، حسن، (1390). باستان‌شناسی و هنر ایران در هزارۀ اول پیش‌ازمیلاد. تهران: سمت.
- طهرانفر، سارا، (1397). «بررسی محوطه‌های تاریخی شهرستان بوئین زهرا». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران (منتشر نشده).
- عظیـم‌زاده، هوشـنگ؛ و راد، بابـک، (1352). «گزارش امامـزاده شـلمبه». تهران: مرکـز اسـناد و مـدارک فرهنگـی (منتشـر نشـده).
- علی‌بیگـــی، ســـجاد، (1389). «ازســـرگیری پژوهش‌هـــای باستان‌شـــناختی در محوطـــۀ پارتـــی بیســتون». پژوهش‌هــای باستان‌شناســی مــدرس، 2 (3): 69-40.
- کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله، (1377). گورخمره‌های اشکانی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
- کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله، (1380). سفال و سفالگری در ایران از آغاز دورۀ نوسنگی تا دوران معاصر. تهران: ققنوس.
- مافی، فرزاد؛ بهنیا، علی؛ و بهرام‌زاده، محمد، (1388). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و گونه‌شناسی سفال دورۀ اشکانی قروه (کردستان)». پیام باستان‌شناس، 6 (12)، 85-104. 
- مرتضایـی، محمـد؛ و بنـوار، ایمـا، (1382). راهنمای باستان‌شناسـی ایـران. تهـران: مریـم.
- نامی، حسن؛ و موسوی‌نیا، سیدمهدی، (1398). «بررسی باستان‌شناسی محوطه‌های اشکانی شهرستان درگز، شمال‌شرق ایران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 11 (1): 233-252. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2019.71116
- نعمتــی، محمدرضــا، (1385). «گــزارش فصــل اول کاوش‌هـای باستان‌شناسی محوطۀ تاریخــی ولیــران». تهران: پژوهشــکدۀ باستانشناســی (منتشــر نشــده).
- نعمتــی، محمدرضــا، (1386). «فصــل اول کاوش محوطۀ تاریخــی ولیــران دماونــد». گزارش‌هــای باستان‌شناســی 7، جلــد 2، پژوهشــگاه ســازمان میراث‌فرهنگــی، صنایع‌دســتی و گردشــگری: 391- 369.
- نعمتــی، محمدرضــا؛ و صدرایی، علی، (1387). «پژوهشــی در فرهنــگ و هنــر دورۀ اشــکانی در فلات‌مرکزی ایــران براســاس ریتون‌هــای مکشــوف از محوطــۀ تاریخــی ولیــران دماونـد». مجلۀ دانشـکده ادبیـات و علـوم انسـانی دانشـگاه تهران، 59 (186-4): 297-279. https://www.academia.edu/105407398
- نعمتــی، محمدرضــا، (1390). «بررســی منطقــۀ دماونــد در دورۀ اشــکانی و ساســانی مطالعـۀ مــوردی: محوطـۀ تاریخــی ولیــران». رســالۀ دکتــری، تهران: دانشــگاه تربیت‌مــدرس (منتشر نشده).
- نعمتــی، محمدرضــا؛ و صدرایی، علی، (1391). «بررســی شــیوه‌های تدفیــن در گورســتان اشــکانی ولیـران دماونـد». مطالعـات باستان‌شناسـی، 4(2): 103-121. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2013.32122
- نعمتی، محمدرضا؛ و باغ‌شیخی، میلاد، (1403). «بررسی و گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های ساسانی محوطۀ زروآوند 2». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 14 (40): 283-253. https://doi.org/10.22084/nb.2023.27375.2547
- واندنبرگ، لوئی، (1348). باستان‌شناسی ایران باستان. ترجمۀ عیسی بهنام، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
- هرینک، ارنی، (1376). سفال ایران در دوران اشکانی. ترجمۀ حمیده چوبک، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
- همتی‌ازندریانی، اسماعیل؛ و خاکسار، علی، (1401). «بررسی مجموعه سفال‌های دوران تاریخی و اسلامی کاوش‌های معماری دست‌کند ارزانفود-همدان». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، ۶ (۲۰): ۱۶۳-۱۸۸.  https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.6.20.163 
- هوتن، امید، (1376). «تکوک‌های ایرانی از هزارۀ چهارم تا پایان دورۀ ساسانی». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز.
- یوگینویچ ماسون، میخائیل؛ و پوگا چنگووا، گالینا آنتولیونا، (1383). ریتون‌های اشکانی نسا. ترجمۀ شهرام حیدرآبادیان، تهران: ماکان.
- Afshari, L. & Naqshineh, A. M., (2015). “Description the Classification and Analysis of Typology of Pottery Parthian Period of Hamedan Sang-e Shir Cemetery”. Iranian Ar-chaeological Studies Journal, 4(10): 113-132. [In Persian]. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_991.html
- Alibeigi, S., (2010). “Resumption of archaeological researches in the Parti-Bisutun Par-thian Site”. Modares Archaeological Researches, 2 (3): 69-40. [In Persian]. https://www.academia.edu/2761249
- Amirlo, E., (1990). “Excavation in Damavand”. Iranian Journal of Archaeology And His-tory, 5(8-9): 90. [In Persian].
- Azimzadeh, H. & Rad, B., (1973). “Report of Imamzadeh Shalambeh”. Teh-ran: Center for Cultural Documents and Records (unpublished). [In Persian].
- Chaychi e Amirkhiz, A. & Saeidi e Harsini, M. R., (2002). A Look at Coffin Burial in Ancient Iran. Tehran: Samira. [In Persian].
- Debevoise, N. C., (1934). Parthian pottery from Seleucia on the Tigris. University of Michigan studies/Humanistic series.
- Dyson, R. H. (1963). “Archaeological scrap: Glimpses of history at Ziwiye”. Expedition, 5(3): 32.
- Finkbeiner, U. & Bittel, K., (1991). “Keramik der seleukidischen und parthischen Zeit aus den Grabungen in Uruk-Warka. I. Teil”. Baghdader Mitteilungen, 22: 537-637.
- Fukai, S., & Matsutani, T., (1980). “Halimehjan 1978. A preliminary report on the survey and soundings in Rudbar, Gilan Province, Iran”. Memoirs (The) of the Institute of Oriental Culture Tokyo, (80): 13-40.
- Haerinck, E., (1983). La Céramique en Iran Pendant la Période Parthe ca. 250 av. J.C. à ca. 225 après J.C.: Typologie, Chronologieet Distribution Iranica Antiqua Supplément II, Gent.
- Haerinck, E., (1997). En Iran Pendent La Periode Parthe. Translated by Hamideh Chobak, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization of the Country[In Persian].
- Hansman, J. & Stronach, D., (1974). “Excavation at Shahri Qumis 1971”. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 106: 8-22.
- Hansman, J. & Stronach, D., (1970). “Excavations at Shahr-i Qūmis, 1967”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 102(1): 29-62.
- Hellyer, P., (1988). “Archaeology in Umm Al QaIwan”. Bulletin, 34: p1. 6.
- Hemmati-Azandariani, I. & Khaksar, A., (1401). “Investigation of the Collection of Pottery from the Historical and Islamic Periods of the Troglodytic Architectural Exca-vations of Arzanfod-Hamedan”. Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies, 6 (20): 163-188. [In Persian].  https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.6.20.163 
- Højlund, F., (2006). “The dating of the Coastal Fortress at Qala’at al‐Bahrain: Sasanian or Islamic?”. Arabian archaeology and epigraphy, 17(2): 238-247.
- Hootan, O., (1997). “Iranian Rhytons from the fourth millennium to the end of the Sas-sanid period”. Master’s thesis, Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch. [In Persian].
- Kambakhsfard, S., (1998). Parthian Pithos -Burials at Germi. Tehran: University Pub-lishing Center. [In Persian].
- Kambakhshfard, S., (2002). Pottery in Iran from Neolithic Period to the Present. Tehran: Qoqnoos. [In Persian].
- Keall, E. J. & Keall, M. J., (1981). “The Qalʿeh-i Yazdigird Pottery: A Statistical Ap-proach”. Iran, 19(1): 33-80.
- Khosrowzadeh, A. & Aali, A., (2004). “Description, classification and typological analysis of Parthian and Sasanian period pottery from the Mah-Neshan region (Zan-jan)”. In: The book Proceedings of the International Conference on Iranian Archaeology, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization of the Country. [In Persian].
- Mafi, F., Behnia, A. & Bahramzadeh, M., (2009). “Description, Classification, and Typology of Parthian Pottery in Qorveh (Kurdistan)”. Payām-e Bāstānshenās Journal, 6 (12): 85-104. [In Persian]. https://journals.iau.ir/article703955535564801438b65c5e4a208a5fcd5391.pdf 
- Mason, E. & PugaChenkovaova, G., (2004).The Parthian Rhytons of Nisa. Translated by Shahram Heydarabadian, Tehran: Makan.[In Persian].
- Mortezaei, M. & Benvar, I., (2003). Guide to the Archaeology of Iran. Tehran: Maryam. [In Persian]..
- Nami, H. & Mousavinia, S. M., (2019). “Archaeological Investigation of Par-thian Sites in Dargaz County, Northeast Iran”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 11 (1): 233-252. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2019.71116..
- Nemati, M. R., (2007). “The First Season of Excavation at the Historical Site of Veliran Damavand”. Archaeological Reports, 7 (2): 391-369. [In Per-sian].
- Nemati, M. R., (2011). “Investigation of the Damavand Region in the Parthian and Sas-sanid Periods: A Case Study: The Historical Site of Veliran”. PHD Thesis, Tehran: Tarbiat-Modares University (unpublished). [In Persian].
- Nemati, M. R. & Sadraei, A., (2012). “Investigation of burial practices in the Parthian Veliran cemetery of Damavand”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 4(2): 103-121. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2013.32122
- Nemati, M. R. & Baghsheikhi, M., (1403). “Study and typology of Sasa-nian pottery Discovered from the Zeroavand 2 site”. Iranian Archaeological Studies Journal, 14 (40): 253-283. [In Persian].  https://doi.org/10.22084/nb.2023.27375.2547.
- Nemati, M. R. & Sadraei, A., (2008). “A Study of Culture and Art in the Par-thian Period in the Central Plateau of Iran Based on the Rhytons Discovered from the Historical Site of Veliran Damavand”. Journal of the Faculty of Litera-ture and Humanities, University of Tehran, 59 (186-4): 297-279. [In Persian]. https://www.academia.edu/105407398
- Nemati, M. R., (2006). “Report of the First Season of Archaeological Excavations at the Historical Site of Veliran”. Tehran : Iranian Center for Archaeological Re-search (unpublished). [In Persian].
- Pazuki Taroudi, N., (2002). A brief introduction to Damavand and a list of its historical and cultural artifacts. Tehran: General Directorate of Cultural Heritage of Tehran Prov-ince. [In Persian].
- Pazuki Taroudi, N., (2002). Historical Monuments of Damavand. Tehran: General Direc-torate of Cultural Heritage of Tehran Province. [In Persian].
- Rahbar, M. & Alibeigi, S., (2011). “Report of archaeological researches to locate La-odicea in Nahavand”. Payām-e Bāstānshenās Journal, 8 (15): 133-160. [In Persian]. https://journals.iau.ir/article7038616dcb09cf1e72e879b2b5bae4b27207ea.pdf
- Saraf, M. R., (1982). “Report on Surveys of Tehran Province,Gerd Tepe Dama-vand”. Tehran: Center for Cultural Documents and Records (unpublished). [In Persian]..
- Sarfaraz, A. A., (1961). “Report on Surveys of Tehran Province, Tapeh Around Damavand”. Tehran: Center for Cultural Documents and Records (unpublished). [In Persian].
- Strommenger, E. & Macuch, R., (1967). Gefässe aus Uruk von der neubabylonischen Zeit bis zu den Sasaniden. Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka.
- Talaei, H., (2011). Archaeology and Art of Iran in the First Millennium BC. Teh-ran: Samt. [In Persian]..
- Tehranfar, S., (2018). “Survey of historical sites in Bueen Zahra County”. Mas-ter’s thesis in Archaeology, Tehran: University of Tehran (unpublished). [In Persian]..
- Tohidi, F., (1998). “An artistic and practical study of vessels called rhyton (sagar) in Iranian art”. Museums Journal, 20: 24-47. General Directorate of Education and Publica-tions & Cultural Productions. [In Persian].
- Tohidi, F. & Tabatabai, M., (No Date), “Report of Surveys of Tehran Province, Damavand Ab e sard”. Tehran: Center for Cultural Documents and Records (unpublished). [In Persian].
- Trinkaus, K. M., 1986, “Pottery from the Damghan Plain, Iran: Chronology and Varia-bility from the Parthian to the Early Islamic Periods”.Studia Iranica, 15: 23-88.
- Vandenberg, L., (1969). Archaeology of Ancient Iran. Translated by Issa Behnam, Tehran: University of Tehran [In Persian].