An Investigation of Archaeological Excavation (Sondage) Results and Analysis of the Symbolic Motifs of Tombstones in the Sefidchah Historical Cemetery

Authors

1 Ph.D in Archaeology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D in Archaeology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Sefid Chah Historical Cemetery is one of the largest and oldest cemeteries of the Islamic era, whose oldest tombs date back to the early Islamic centuries. Sefid Chah village is in the Yanehsar section of Behshahr city in Mazandaran province. This study aims to sondage and set the limit of this area, analyze the tombstone motifs, and compare it with other similar cemeteries in other parts of Iran. One of the questions of this research is the main reason for the burial sequence during different periods in this cemetery? Moreover, what was the reason for the importance of this cemetery for the people of this region? The present research hypothesis in answer to this question is that due to its mountainous and impassable Yaneh Sar, this region has been a haven and refuge for the opponents of the Bani Umayyad and Bani Abbas governments since the beginning of Islam. Therefore, this region is the burial place of many shrines. Also, the people from the distant past believe that due to this region’s high lime and soil type, their corpses decompose late and last longer, and for this reason, it sanctified from the distant past. In this research, using sondage, surface survey study, and objective observations, have been determined to set the limit of cemetery and analysis of the tombstones of this historic cemetery. The results show that most of the tombstones in this cemetery include Islamic, geometric, and symbolic motifs. Its monuments are very similar to the tombstones of Darul Salam Cemetery in Shiraz and Nahar Khoran Cemetery in Gorgan. Due to no discovery of cultural materials, this area has been used only as a cemetery since the early Islamic centuries.
Keywords: Altar Tombs, Coffin Tombs, Petroglyph, Sefid Chah, Symbolic Motifs.
Introduction
Sefid Chah cemetery is the most prominent Islamic cemetery in Iran, which has many graves that date back to the early centuries of Islam and almost 1200 years ago. However, most of these graves either have been destroyed, or their tombstones damaged severely. Sefid Chah Cemetery consists of four parts, the most critical of which is related to the central region. The Central Cemetery is the largest and the oldest tombstone discovered in this part. Most parts of the main cemetery belong to the year 830 AH, the Timurid period. According to the tombstone of the eighth and ninth centuries AH, these graves belonged to Sadat Mir Emadi, Sadat Marashi, Rooz Afzooni, and other local kings in this region (Vafaei, 1381: 11). Historical records show that the area of Hezar Jerib has been significant since the Achaemenid period because the Mards and Tapurs, who were the first inhabitants of northern Iran, especially the Tabarestan region, were The local governor of this region in the Achaemenid period. During the Parthian period, the land of Tabarestan and Gorgan, especially the mountainous region of hezar jerib, was significant due to its proximity to the second Parthian capital (Sad darvazeh city- present-day Damghan) (Asgari, 1350: 120-118). The most important ruling dynasty of Hezar jerib in the Islamic period was the Bavandian or Al-Bavand dynasty, which ruled in Tabarestan from 94 BH until 750 AH. The main issue of this research is finding out that in the early centuries of Islam, the Sefid Chah region was the seat of the rulers of Hezar jerib or was used only as a cemetery. The necessity and lack of knowledge in this research are very little research done concerning Sefid Chah cemetery. This cemetery is the most prominent Islamic cemetery in Iran, which is very important in terms of the type and variety of graffiti designs. The tombstones of Sefid Chah are in the chest and altar form with masterpieces of various and unique designs, which originate from nature, the simple and unpretentious life of the people of this land.
 
Analysis of Tombstone Motifs in Sefid Chah Historical Cemetery
Tombstones in every region and every country were related to the architecture and culture of that region. For example, tombstones found during the Islamic period in Spain and Africa have crescent-shaped horseshoe arches, which were specific to the architecture of these regions. Horseshoe arches are found in many architectural monuments discovered in Spain and Africa, including palaces and mosques. In the Islamic world, tombstones have various shapes, representing each region’s architecture. In Sefid Chah cemetery, the tombstones are mostly altar and chest-shaped, both of which have an architectural background in Iran (author). Due to the high rainfall in this area, most houses have gabled roofs. The alter motif is A design belonging to Mithraism engraved on tombstones after Islam from the fourth century AH onwards (Razi, 1371: 103-90). The altar tombs of Sefid Chah cemetery, which constitute the maximum number of tombstones in this region, have been taken from Iranian architectural monuments. An altar is a sanctuary considered a window to God and the truth of existence before and after Islam. So, carving its image on tombstones has not been irrelevant (Author). The issue that distinguishes this cemetery from other Islamic cemeteries in different parts of Iran is the particular designs. However, Sefid Chah Cemetery is the only cemetery of the Islamic period with the most abstract plant motifs, geometric, symbolic motifs, altar motifs, and no human motif obtained from this area, which is unique in this regard. Another issue is the principle of symmetry between geometric and plant motifs, which is very significant.
 
Discussion
The architecture and culture have influenced tombstones in every region and every country in that region. For example, tombstones found in Islamic Age in Spain and Africa have horseshoe crescent arches which were the architectural tradition of these regions. Because been found many horseshoe arches in Spain and Africa, in the Islamic world, tombstones have various shapes that are the architectural tradition in these regions. In Sefid Chah cemetery, tombstones are mostly altar and box-shaped, both of which have an architectural background in Iran. The more tombstones in Sefid Chah cemetery are altar tombstones. Among other cemeteries in Islamic Age similar to the Sefid Chah can be mentioned to Darolsalam cemetery in Shiraz, Onar cemetery in Ardabil, Eile Gouran cemetery in west Islamabad, and Nahar Khoran cemetery in Gorgan.
 
Conclusion
Based on seven boreholes excavated to set the cemetery’s limit, this area’s soil texture is very rocky and full of lime. In the past, the conditions of this soil were very unfavorable for agriculture. For this reason, artifacts representing human settlements have not have found. So, according to the excavation made around this cemetery, due to the religious monument (Imamzadeh seh tan), this area was used only as a cemetery from the early Islamic centuries. According to this cemetery’s historical background, since the Timurid period, this cemetery has expanded considerably. Another critical point shows that Sefid Chah Cemetery is the only cemetery from the early Islamic centuries to the present century because the people around this area believe that because the soil of this area has much lime, their corpses rot late. They bury their dead here due to the sanctity of this place, which caused the cemetery’s expansion. Therefore, today the cemetery is larger than the residential part of the village. Due to the uncontrolled growth of the cemetery and land scarcity, people bury their dead in old graves, which has caused many old tombstones to be broken and destroyed.

Keywords

Main Subjects


- احمدزاده، فرید؛ حسینی، سید هاشم؛ و نورسی، حامد، 1397، «پژوهشی بر شناخت مضامین و نقوش سنگ قبور ایل گوران در شهرستان اسلام آباد غرب». مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی، 3 (1): 92-79.
- اعظم‌زاده، محمد؛ و قریشی، سیده مهسا، 1393، «مطالعه ای بر نقاط اشتراک و افتراق نقوش در گورستان سفیدچاه و معماری تکایا در طبرستان». دومین همایش ملی هنر طبرستان: 36.
- افضل طوسی، عفت السادات؛ و جلالیان‌فرد، ناهید، 1397، «نمادشناسی پرندگان در فرهنگ اسلامی». نشریۀ پژوهشنامه گرافیک و نقاشی، 1 (1): 40-30.
پویان، جواد؛ و خلیلی، مژگان، 1389، «نشانه‌شناسی نقوش سنگ‌قبرهای دارالسلام شیراز». هنر، 144: 14.
- ترابی، مرضیه، 1394، «نقش درخت در هنر ایران باستان و بازتاب آن در هنر سلجوقی». گیلان: کنفرانس بین المللی معماری: 23.
- حسینی‌خاچیک، سید مرتضی، 1392، «بررسی و مطالعه نقوش سنگ‌مزارهای گورستان سفیدچاه گلوگاه بهشهر». پایان‌نامه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز.
- چارئی، عبدالرضا، 1387، «نقش‌های سنگ‌مزارهای گورستان دارالسلام». آینه خیال، 6: 136.
- صفی‌خانی، نینا؛ احمدپناه، سید ابوتراب؛ و خدادادی، علی، 1393، «نشانه‌شناسی نقوش سنگ قبور قبرستان تخت فولاد اصفهان (با تأکید بر نقوش حیوانی شیر و ماهی)». هنرهای تجسمی، 19(4): 80-67.
- عابددوست، حسین؛ و پورزیبا، کاظم، 1390، «تداوم حیات نماد کوه و درخت در هنر تصویری کهن ایران و نمود آن بر فرش‌های معاصر ایرانی». نگره، 6 (20):  33.
- عسگری، علی‌بابا، 1350، اشرف‌البلاد (بهشهر ). تهران: شرکت سهامی ایران چاپ.
- علی‌نژاد، روجا، 1393، «سفیدچاه نمایه ای فراتر از یک گورستان: شناخت و بررسی مضامین و نقوش تصویری گورستان سفیدچاه». هنرهای تجسمی، 19 (2):  24.
- دوبوکور، مونیک، 1373، رمزهای زنده جان. ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، نشر مرکز.
- رضی، هاشم، 1371، آئین مهر - میترائسیم. انتشارات بهجت.
- ریاحی، علی‌اصغر، 1379، سیمای جغرافیایی هزار جریب بهشهر. نشر آیندگان.
- صفاران، الیاس؛ و متولی، محمد، 1395، «بررسی عناصر و نقوش زنان در سنگ‌مزارات گورستان سفیدچاه (شهرستان بهشهر استان مازندران)». دومین کنگرۀ بین‌المللی علوم زمین و توسعۀ شهری: 32.
- قراگوزلو، بهاره؛ غلامعلی، حاتم، 1393، «بررسی رمز نقوش هندسی دایره، مثلث و مربع در هنر اسلامی». نقش‌مایه، 8 (21): 45-50.
- کلبادی‌نژاد، مریم، 1390، مطالعه و بررسی گورستان سفیدچاه. ساری: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی.
- کوپر، جی سی، 1379، فرهنگ مصور نمادهای سنتی. ترجمۀ ملیحـه کرباسیان، نشـر فرشاد.  
- کوهزاد، نازنین، 1389، «تقدس سرو در هنر ایران». نقش‌مایه، 3 (5): 16-7.
- مرادی، سعید؛ و شیخی، شکوفه، 1396، «بررسی هنر آینه‌کاری در معماری اسلامی با تأکید بر تفاوت کاربرد آن در اماکن مذهبی». سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش در علوم و تکنولوژی: 40-30.
- موسوی‌کوهپر، سید مهدی؛ خانعلی، حمید؛ و نیستانی، جواد، 1394، «سنگ‌های مزار، نمودی از وحدت مذاهب مختلف اسلامی در ایران، گونه‌شناسی، طبقه‌بندی و مطالعۀ آرایه‌های سنگ‌مزارهای نوع گهواره‌ای». پژوهش‌نامۀ تاریخ اسلام، 1 (20): 42-37.
- نظری‌زاده، فریده؛ و مشهدی حاجی‌علی، فاطمه، 1394، «نماد خورشید در هنر ایران باستان». همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، دانشگاه بیرجند، 2: 45-39.
- وفائی، شهربانو، 1381، «مطالعه و مستند‌سازی گورستان سفیدچاه بهشهر». ساری: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی استان مازندران.
 
- Abed Doust, H. & Pourziba, K., 2011, “Continuity of life symbolized by mountain and tree in the ancient pictorial art of Iran and its appearance on contemporary Iranian carpet”. Negareh, 6 (20): 33.
- Afzal Tousi, E. & Jalalian Fard, N., 2018, “Bird symbolism in Islamic culture”. Graphic and painting research paper, 1(1): 30-40.
- Ahmadzadeh, F.; Hosseini, H. & Noursi, H. M., 2018, “A research on the recognition of the themes and tombstone motifs in Eile Guran in west Islamabad”. Theoretical foundations of visual arts, 3 (1): 79-92.
- Alinejad, R., 2014, “Sefid Chah profile beyond a cemetery recognizing and investigating themes and pictorial motifs of Sefid Chah cemetery.” Honarhaye Tajassomi, 19 (2): 24.
- Asgari, A. B., 1971, “Ashrafol Belad (Behshahr)”. Tehran: Iran Chap: 118-120.
- Azamzadeh, M. & Ghoreishi, S.M., 2014, “A study on commonalities and difference of motifs in Sefid Chah cemetery and Takaya architecture in Tabaristan”. The second national art conference of Tabaristan, P: 36.
-  Chareei, A., 2008, “Tombstones motifs of Darol Salam cemetery”.  Aeineye Khiyal, 6: 136.
- Douberkour, M., 1994, Live passwords. Translation: Jalal Sattari, Tehran: publishing center.
- Faragozlou, B. & Gholam Ali, H., 2014, “Investigating the password of the circle, triangle and square geometric motifs in Islamic art”. Naghshmayeh, 8 (21): 45-50.
- Hosseini Khachik, SM., 2013, “Investigating and studying tombstone motifs in Sefid Chah Behshahr cemetery”. Tehran: Islamic University.
- Kolbadi Nejad, M., 2011, “Investigating and studying Sefid Chah cemetery”. Mazandaran: Organization of Cultural Heritage, Tourism, and Handicrafts, Pp: 28-34.
- Kouhzad, N., 2010, “The sacredness of Cedar in Iranian art”.  Nghshmayeh, 3 (5): 7-16.
- Kouper, J., 2000, Illustrated culture of traditional symbols. Translation: Malihe Karbasian, Tehran: Farshad.
- Moradi, S. & Sheikhi, SH., 2017, “Investigating the art of mirror work in Islamic architecture with an emphasis on the difference in its use in religious places”. The third International Research conference in science and technology: 30-40.
- Mousavi Kouhpar, S. M.; Khanali, H. & Neyestani, J., 2015, “Tombstones, are a manifestation of the unity of different Islamic religious in Iran, Typology, Classification, and study of tombstone arrays of Crandle Type”. Islamic history research paper, 1 (20): 37-42.
- Nazarizadeh, F. & Mashhadi Hajiali, F., 2015, “The symbol of the sun in ancient Iranian art”. National Conference of Iranian Archaeology, Birjand University, 2: 39-45
- Razi, H., 1992, Mehr Ritual-Mithraism. Tehran: Behjat.
- Riyahi, A. A., 2000, Geographical map of Hezar Jerib Behshahr. Ayandegan.
- Pouyan, J. & Khalili, M., 2010, “Semiotics of tombstone motifs in Darol Salam, Shiraz”. Honar, 144: 14.
- Safikhani, N.; Ahmadpanah, S. & Khodadadi, A., 2014, “Semiotics of tombstone motifs in Takhte Foulad of Isfahan (with emphasis on lion and fish animal motifs)”. Visual arts, 19 (4): 67-80.
- Saffaran, E. & Motevalli, M., 2016, “Investigating elements and motifs in the Sefid Chah cemetery (Behshahr-Mazandaran)”. Second International congress of Earth Science and Urban development: 32.
- Torabi, M., 2015, “The motif of tree in ancient Iranian art and its reflection in Seljuk art”. International architecture conference: 23.
-Vafaei, SH., 2002, “Studying and documenting Sefid Chah cemetery”. Mazandaran: Organization of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts.