مطالعۀ ترکیب آلیاژ و روش ساخت سنجاق سرهای مفرغی متعلق به عصرآهن محوطۀ دایاآردیزی مورانی لرستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مرمت آثار تاریخی و فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ مرمت و حفاظت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه مرمت آثار تاریخی و فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ مرمت و حفاظت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران .

3 عضو هیأت علمی دانشکدۀ مرمت و حفاظت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

4 کارشناسی ارشد باستان شناسی، مدیر امور فرهنگی و روابط عمومی اداره کل میراث فرهنگی لرستان، لرستان، ایران.

چکیده

لرستان ناحیه‌ای مهم در زمینۀ فلزگری عصرآهن در ایران است، اما به نسبت آثار مفرغی فراوان به‌دست آمده یا منسوب به آن، اطلاعات کمی از فناوری فلزگری کهن در این ناحیه وجود دارد. «دایاآردیزی مورانی» نام یکی از محوطه‌های پیش‌ازتاریخ این ناحیه است که با توجه به آثار و مواد فرهنگی متنوع و فراوان به‌دست آمده از آن طی تنها فصل کاوش انجام شده، شواهد استقرار از دورۀ مس‌وسنگ تا عصرآهن در آن مشاهده شده است. ازجمله یافته‌های این محوطه، شماری از اشیاء مفرغی است که تاکنون مطالعۀ فنی و متالورژیکی برروی ‌آن‌ها انجام نگرفته است؛ از این‌رو، با هدف شناخت بخشی از دانش فلزگری کهن این منطقه، هفت سنجاق‌سر مفرغی متعلق به عصرآهن، به‌منظور پی‌بردن به ترکیب شیمیایی و روش ساخت ‌آن‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های آزمایشگاهی شامل: متالوگرافی و SEM-EDS موردمطالعه و آنالیز قرار گرفت. نتایج مطالعات SEM-EDS نشان‌داد که به‌جز یک نمونه ساخته شده از آلیاژ مس آرسنیکی، تمامی سنجاق‌سرها از مفرغ قلعی با میزان متغیر قلع ساخته شده‌اند که بیانگر روش متداول تولید آلیاژ مفرغ بدون کنترل برروی میزان قلع (استحصال هم‌زمان فلز مس و قلع با هم یا استحصال فلز از یک سنگ معدن حاوی ترکیب مس و قلع طبیعی)، همانند دیگر محوطه‌های عصرآهن ایران است. مشاهدۀ آخال‌های سولفیدی نیز در ریزساختار نمونه‌ها بیانگر استفاده از سنگ معدن‌های سولفیدی مس (احتمالاً مخلوط با سنگ معدن‌های اکسیدی) در فرآیند استحصال جهت تولید اشیاء این منطقه است؛ هم‌چنین در مطالعات ریزساختاری این سنجاق‌سرها، ریزساختار شامل دانه‌های کارشده و بازتبلوریافته دارای خطوط دوقلویی مشخص گردید که نشان‌دهندۀ استفاده از چکش‌کاری و تابکاری برای ساخت این آثار است. افزون‌بر این، خطوط لغزش نیز در ریزساختار برخی از نمونه‌ها مشاهده گردید که بیانگر استفاده از چکش‌کاری سرد در مرحلۀ پایانی ساخت این آثار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study on Composition and Manufacturing Method of Bronze Pins from Dia Ardizi of Moorani Iron Age Site, Luristan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Samane Palizvan 1
  • Omid Oudbashi 2
  • Mohammad Mortazavy 3
  • Ata Hasanpour 4
1 M.A. in Archeology, Department of Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.
4 Ph.D. in Archeology, Director of Cultural Affairs and Public Relations of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of the province, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Luristan, located in the west of Iran, is an important region in the field of metallurgy of the Iron Age in Iran, but comparing to its huge bronze finds or attributed to it, there is little information about the metallurgical technology in this area. Dia ardizi Moorani is one of the prehistorical sites which is excavated recently in southern Luristan. According to the various finds, such as a number of architectural structures, debris of the six grave stone, a burial, pottery, stone, bone, metal etc., during one excavation season, a settlement from chalcolithic to Iron Age has been observed in this area. A significant number of bronze objects are among the findings of this site. Therefore, to recognize the ancient metallurgical technology in the site, seven bronze pins belong to Iron Age were studied using laboratory method including metallography and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) in order to identify chemical composition and manufacturing techniques. The results of SEM-EDS showed that except for one sample made of arsenic copper alloy, all of the pins were made of tin bronze with different amount of tin which indicates the method of producing bronze alloy without control on tin amount similar to other areas of Iron Age in Iran. SEM-EDS analyses also revealed elements such as nickel, silver, arsenic and iron as minor elements in all samples which could be attributed to the impurities of the ore used in the metal extraction process. In addition, microstructural investigation clearly showed various sulfide inclusions and lead globules. Moreover, elongated inclusions can be an indication of significant hot working or cold working and annealing to achieve the final shape. Also, the micro structures of the pins revealed re-crystallized twin grain structures that indicate the use of multiple procedures, including hot-working or cold-working and annealing to manufacture these pins.  Keywords: Iron Age of Luristan, Dia Ardizi of Moorani, Bronze Alloy, Metallurgical, SEM-EDS.
Introduction
Study of metallic objects and archaeometallurgical materials discovered from archeological excavations is very important because of revealing the role and importance of metallurgy during the ancient time and understanding various aspects of this technology in different region and periods. Furthrmore, metals and metallurgical technology had very impressive influence on the human life in the ancient world. Therefore, archaeometallurgical investigations with the aim of providing information about mining, smelting, alloying and manufacturing technique were carried out on archaeological and historical metallic materials. Despite the importance of the Iranian Plateau as one of the origins of ancient metallurgy in Southwest Asia and Near East, it is noteworthy that a significant number of metallurgical evidences have not been studied so far in this region. Study on metal objects belong to different prehistoric sites in Iran have been applied to identify chemical composition and various metalworking processes in prehistoric period especially the Bronze Age and the Iron Age.
Luristan is one of the important regions in the Iranian Plateau that is located in western Iran, and is very important in the field of metallurgy of copper alloys during the Iron Age (1500-550 BC), but it has not been studied widely in the field of archaeometallurgy in comparison to its significantly huge tin bronze objects that are find from the archaeological excavations in Luristan or are attributed to it. Therefore, there is little information about the metallurgical technology in the Luristan region.
One of the recent archaeological activities in the Luristan region is the excavation of the prehistoric site of Dia ‌Ardizi of Moorani that was identified during modern works by a mechanical excavator in order to widening road accidentally in 2014. According to the architectural remains and various artefacts and cultural materials discovered from the excavations, including various architectural structures, remains of the six stone graves, different potteries, stone and bone objects, metal artefacts, etc., the settlements has been dated from the Chalcolithic to the Iron Age periods (4th to 1st millennium BC). Among the archaeological finds, a significant number of bronze objects are discovered from this site that they are not studied previously. The aim of this study is to perform an analytical study to characterize the manufacturing process applied to produce some metallic pins dated to the Iron Age.
 
 
Materials and Methods
Therefore, regarding to the aim of the study, seven metallic pins dated back to the Iron Age (firstmillennium BC) from the site were selected. For analytical study, a small fragment from each object was cut by jeweler’s saw and was mounted in epoxy resin and then was ground and polished. The prepared cross sections then were studied by analytical methods including metallography (OM) and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) in order to identify chemical composition of the metal/alloy and manufacturing technique used to shape the objects.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of SEM-EDS showed that except for one object made of arsenical copper alloy, all of the pins are made of tin bronze with variable amount of tin. This Sn-variable containing alloy indicates that the alloying process to obtain tin bronze alloy has been performed by ancient metalworkers without control on tin content by using some alloying processes such as smelting of copper and tin ores (co-smelting), smelting of metallic ores containing copper and tin compounds (complex Cu-Sn ores) or cementation as is observed in other tin bronze objects from the Iron Age in Iran. SEM-EDS analyses also revealed presence of other elements such as nickel, silver, arsenic and iron as minor elements in samples which could be attributed to the impurities from the metallic ores used in the metal smelting process.
Presence of sulphide inclusions in the microstructure of samples also indicates the use of sulphidic copper ores (or mixture of sulphidic and oxidic copper ores) in the process of copper smelting to produce these objects. On the other hand, small lead globules are present in the SEM-BSE micrographs of the cross sections.
Moreover, the elongated sulphidic inclusions can be an indication of undergoing heavy working (hammering) on the objects (pins) to achieve the final shape. Also, the etched microstructure of the pins indicated re-crystallized twin grains that proved the use of multiple thermos-mechanical procedures, including hot-working or cycles of cold-working and annealing to manufacture these pins. In addition, metallographic study showed some remnant coring superimposed on the re-crystallized grains in the microstructure of some pins. In this case, casting has been used to produce primary ingot or primary shape of the pins leading to coring that has not been removed completely by thermos-mechanical processes. In addition, slip lines were also observed in the microstructures of some samples which suggesting the use of cold-working as a final process.
 
Conclusion
An analytical study was undertaken on a series of pins excavated from Dia Ardizi of Moorani, a prehistoric site located in southern Luristan. The results showed application of Sn-variable tin bronze to produce these objects, a commonplace process observed during the Iron Age of Luristan. On the other hand, the objects are shaped by thermos-mechanical processes that has not been enough to remove all coring occurred during the casting of the tin bronze pieces, in some cases. Totally, the process of manufacturing the Iron Age pins from Dia Ardizi prehistoric site is similar with previous analytical works undertaken on the Iron Age copper-base objects from Iran, and in particular Luristan.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Iron Age of Luristan
  • Dia Ardizi of Moorani
  • Bronze Alloy
  • Metallurgical
  • SEM-EDS
- اسکات، دیوید ا.، 1395، متالوگرافی و ریزساختار در فلزات باستانی و تاریخی. ترجمۀ امید عودباشی و عاطفه شکفته. اصفهان: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی (واحد اصفهان).
- پالیزوان، سمانه، 1396، «مطالعه روش ساخت در تعدادی از اشیاء مفرغی محوطۀ عصرآهن دیاآردیزی مورانی لرستان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌سنجی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
- حسن‌پور، عطا؛ جوادی‌نیا، زهرا؛ صادقی‌راد، مسعود؛ و حیدری، زبیر، 1394، «کاوش اضطراری محوطۀ دیاآردیزی مورانی (پلدختر- لرستان)». مرکز اسناد اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان لرستان (منتشر نشده).
- حسینی‌پناه‌صومعه‌سرایی، سولماز؛ عودباشی، امید؛ و مرتضوی، محمد، 1397، «مطالعۀ فرایند فلزگری در مفرغ‌های باستانی دورة آهن گورستان تول تالش گیلان». مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسان جوان، به‌کوشش: محمدحسین عزیزی خرانقی، مرتضی خانی‌پور، رضا ناصری، تهران: 1394، بنیاد ایران‌شناسی، صص: 531-553.
- طلایی، حسن، 1388، عصر مفرغ ایران، تهران: انتشارات سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
- طلایی، حسن، 1389، عصرآهن ایران. تهران: انتشارات سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).
- عودباشی، امید؛ امامی، سید محمدامین؛ و احمدی، دوامی، 1393، «فلزگری کهن و استحصال مس در محوطۀ باستانی هفت تپّۀ خوزستان، هزارۀ دوم قبل از میلاد». مهندسی متالورژی و مواد، شمارۀ 25، دورۀ 2، صص: 99-112.
- عودباشی، امید؛ و حسن‌پور، عطا، 1395، «مطالعات آزمایشگاهی برروی آلیاژ و ریزساختار اشیاء مفرغی محوطۀ عصر آهن باباجیلان لرستان». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، شمارۀ 8، دورۀ 1، صص: 149-133.
- قدوسیان، طلحه؛ صمدی، احد؛ و طلایی، حسن، 1396، «واکاوی جنبه‌هایی از متالورژی باستانی دشت قزوین بر مبنای داده‌های فلزی مکشوفه از قبور عصر آهن II قبرستان سگزآباد». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، سال 9، شمارۀ 1، صص: 167-187.
- مرتضوی، محمد؛ و گلعذار، محمدعلی، 1389، «ارزیابی متالورژیکی مهره‌های گردنبند باستانی به‌دست آمده از بیستون، کرمانشاه». مهندسی متالورژی، سال 13، شمارۀ 39، صص: 44-39.
- مصلحی، مرضیه؛ عبداله‌خان گرجی، مهناز؛ نظافتی، نیما؛ نوکنده، جبرئیل؛ و عباسی، قربانعلی، 1392، «مطالعات باستان‌سنجی و مرمتی بر روی منتخبی از اشیاء مس‌پایه دورۀ مفرغ پایانی از تپه بازگیر، دشت گرگان». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، شمارۀ 8 (1)، صص: 111-128.
 
- Angelini, I.; Frizzi, T.; Alberti, R.; Masiero, E.; Artioli, G.; Molin, G. & Venturino Gambari, M., 2007, “Snapshot of a Final Bronze Age metalworker: archaeometallurgical study of the hoard and the working tools from Chiusa di Pesio, Cuneo, Italy”. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Archaeometallurgy in Europe, Pp: 17-21.
- Chiavari, C.; Esposti, M. D.; Garagnani, G. L. & Martini, C., 2011 “Ancient Metallurgy at the Sumhuram (Sultanate of Oman): Technical Aspects of Raised Inscriptions on South Arabian Bronze”. Archaeometry, Vol. 53 (3), Pp: 528-546.
-  Gomez de Salazar, J. G.; Barrena, M. I. & Soria, A., 2004, “Ancient iron and bronze pieces from La Tejada: Characterization studies”. JOM, Vol. 56(6), Pp: 14-16.
- Dungworth, D., 2013, “An experimental study of early bronze smithing techniques”. In: D Dungworth and R C P Doonan (eds) Accidental and Experimental Archaeometallurgy (London), Pp: 149–152.
- Figueiredo, E.; Senna-Martínez, J. C.; Silva, R. J. C.; Araújo, M. F.’ Ventura, J. M. Q. & Carvalho, H., 2007, “Late Bronze Age Metal Artefacts from an Orientalising Burial (?) at Fraga dos Corvos (Macedo de Cavaleiros–NE Portugal): A First Archaeometallurgical Approach”. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference” Archaeometallurgy in Europe, Pp: 17-21
- Figueiredo, E.; Silva, R. J.; Araújo, M. F. & Senna-Martinez, J. C., 2010, “Identification of ancient gilding technology and Late Bronze Age metallurgy by EDXRF, Micro-EDXRF, SEM-EDS and metallographic techniques”. Microchimica Acta, Vol. 168(3-4), Pp: 283-291.
- Fleming, S. J.; Pigott, V. C.; Swann, C. P. & Nash, S. K., 2005, “Bronze in Luristan”. Iranica Antiqua, No. 40, Pp: 35-64.
- Fleming, S. J.; Pigott, V. C.; Swann, C. P.; Nash, S. K.; Haerinck, E.& Overlaet, B., 2006, “The archaeometallurgy of war kabud, Western Iran”. Iranica antiqua, Vol. 41, Pp: 31-57.
- Frame, L., 2010, “Metallurgical investigations at Godin Tepe, Iran, Part I: the metal finds”. Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 37(7), Pp: 1700-1715.
- Giumlia-Mair, A.; Keall, E. J.; Shugar, A. N. & Stock, S., 2002, “Investigation of a copper-based hoard from the Megalithic site of al-Midamman, Yemen: an interdisciplinary approach”. Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 29(2), Pp: 195-209.
- Ingo, G. M.; de Caro, T.; Riccucci, C.; Angelini, E.; Grassini, S.; Balbi, S.; Bernardini, P.; Silva, D., Bousselmi L.; Cilingiroglu, A.; Gener, M.; Gouda, V. K.; Al Jarrah, O.; Khosrof, S.; Mahdjoub, Z.; Al Saad, Z.; El-Saddik, W. & Vassiliou, P., 2006, “Large scale investigation of chemical composition, structure and corrosion mechanism of bronze archeological artefacts from Mediterranean basin”. Applied Physics A, Vol. 83, Pp: 513-520.
- Kienlin, T. L.; Bischoff, E. & Opielka, H., 2006, “Copper and bronze during the Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age: a metallographic examination of axes from the Northalpine region”. Archaeometry, Vol. 48(3), Pp: 453-468.
- Lechtman, H., 2014, “Arsenic bronze: dirty copper or chosen alloy? A view from the Americas”. Journal of Field Archaeology, Vol. 23(4), Pp: 477-514.
- Moorey, P. R. S., 1969, “Prehistoric copper and bronze metallurgy in western Iran (with special reference to Lūristān)”. Iran Vol. 7, Pp: 131-153.
- Mortazavi, M.; Salehi Kakhki, A.; Golozar, M. A. & Tala’i, H., 2011, “Preliminary Metallurgical Investigation of Copper-Based Artifacts at Tepe Sagzabad in Qazvin Plain, Iran (1500-800 BC)”. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, Vol. 1(2), Pp: 49-59.
- Oudbashi, O., 2020, “A New Look at an Old Technology: Insights into the Metallurgy of Tin Bronze during the Iron Age of Luristan”. Proceedings of the XXth International Congress on Ancient Bronzes: Resource, reconstruction, representation, role, Bar Publishing, Philipp Baas (Ed.), Pp: 91-100.
- Oudbashi, O., 2019, “The Bronze Metallurgy in the Iron Age: Tin Bronze Production Tradition during the Iron Age in the Central Zagros”. Proceedings of Iron Age in Western Iran and the Neighboring Regions: Problems and Priorities, 2-3 November, 2019, Sanandaj, Pp: 206-219.
- Oudbashi, O. & Hasanpour, A., 2018, “Bronze alloy production during the Iron Age of Luristan: a multianalytical study on recently discovered bronze objects”. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, Vol. 10, Pp: 1443-1458.
- Oudbashi, O. & Hessari, M., 2017, “Iron Age tin bronze metallurgy at Marlik, Northern Iran: an analytical investigation”. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences,Vol. 9, Pp: 1-17.
- Oudbashi, O. & Davami, P., 2014, “Metallography and microstructure interpretation of some archaeological tin bronze vessels from Iran”. Materials Characterization, Vol. 97, Pp: 74-82.
- Oudbashi, O.; Emami, S. M.; Malekzadeh, M.; Hassanpour, A. & Davami, P., 2013, “Archaeometallurgical studies on the bronze vessels from “Sangtarashan”, Luristan, W-Iran”. Iranica Antiqua, Vol. 48, Pp: 147-74.
- Oudbashi, O.; Emami, S. M. & Davami, P., 2012, “Bronze in Archaeology: A Review of the Archaeometallurgy of Bronze in Ancient Iran”. In: Copper Alloys – Early Applications and Current Performance – Enhancing Processes, Intech Open Access Publication, Pp: 153-178.
- Oudbashi, O. & Mortazavi, M., 2011, “Some Aspects of Heat Treatment in Ancient and Historic Copper Alloy Artefacts”. Proceedings of International Conference on Materials Heat Treatment (ICMH 2011), Islamic Azad University, Majlesi Branch, May 10-12, 2011, Isfahan, Iran.
- Pigott, V. C., 2004, Hasanlu and The Emergence of Iron in Early 1st Millennium BC, Western Iran. Persias Ancient Splendour, Mining, Handicraft and Archaeology, Deutsches Bergbau-Museum, Bochum, Pp: 24–43.
- Scott, D. A., 2002, Copper and Bronze in art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
- Silva, R. J. C.; Figueiredo, E.; Araújo, M. F.; Pereira, F. & Braz Fernandes, F. M., 2008, “Microstructure interpretation of copper and bronze archaeological artefacts from Portugal”. In: Materials Science Forum, Vol. 587, Pp: 365-369.
- Thornton, C. P., 2009, “The emergence of complex metallurgy on the Iranian Plateau: escaping the Levantine paradigm”. Journal of World Prehistory, Vol. 22(3), Pp: 301-327.
- Valério, P.; Silva, R. J. C.; Araújo, M. F.; Soares, A. M. M. & Braz Fernandes, F. M., 2010, “Microstructural signatures of bronze archaeological artifacts from the southwestern Iberian Peninsula”. In: Materials Science Forum, Vol. 636, Pp: 597-604.