درک مقدماتی تحولات و الگوی استقراری دوره مفرغ جدید حوضه کشف‌رود(دشت مشهد)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه باستان شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد باستان شناسی، ایران.

چکیده

بازۀ زمانی نیمۀ دوم هزارۀ دوم پیش‌ازمیلاد (حدود  1800-1700 پ.م.)  هم‌زمان با فروپاشی مراکز شهری پیچیده در نیمۀ شرقی فلات ایران، به‌ویژه شمال‌شرق است. در میانه و جنوب‌غربی آسیای میانه پس از تغییر مذکور  استقرار محوطه‌ها تداوم‌یافته که با نام فرهنگ بلخ-مرو (BMAC) شناخته می‌شود. براساس دانش فعلی باستان‌شناسی، در شمال‌شرق ایران، اعم‌از: خراسان، دشت گرگان و شاهرود، استقرارها در حدود 1700 پ.م. متروک شده و با وجود یک دورۀ فترت، دوباره در عصرآهن  با ظهور گورستان‌ها تداوم‌یافته‌اند. ارزیابی اولیۀ این تحولات در حوضۀ ‌کشف‌رود در محدودۀ دشت مشهد به‌عنوان یکی از مناطق فرهنگی خراسان، ازجمله اهداف و ضرورت مطالعات این دوره محسوب می‌شود. ارزیابی فاز زمانی دورۀ مفرغ جدید در رویکردی تطبیقی و مطالعۀ فرهنگ غالب حوضۀ کشف‌رود و بررسی اولیۀ تحولات این دوره از اصلی‌ترین پرسش‌های پژوهش است. ازطرفی دیگر، مطالعۀ الگوی استقراری نیز از اهم اهداف پژوهش است. این پژوهش با رویکرد باستان‌شناسی چشم‌انداز و به‌روش تحلیل نقشه‌های خروجی ArcGIS انجام شده است. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر همگونی شاخصه‌های سفالی دورۀ مفرغ جدید حوضۀ کشف‌رود با آسیای میانه و مشخصاً دو فاز زمانی گنور و تغلق و نمونه سفال‌های گنورتپه در ترکمنستان و جارکوتان در ازبکستان می‌باشد. هم‌چنین مطالعۀ کانون‌های استقراری، هرچند کاهش وسعت و یا متروک‌شدن برخی از استقرارهای دورۀ مفرغ میانی را نشان می‌دهد، اما ازنظر تعداد استقرارها، کاهشی دیده نشده و استقرارهای جدیدی نیز در این دوره برای اولین‌بار مسکون شده است؛ هم‌چنین، نتایج بیانگر استمرار استقرار و تغییر احتمالی در نوع معیشت برخی از جوامع استقراری این دوره است. استقرارهای این دوره نیز همانند ادوار فرهنگی گذشته، به‌شدت به رودخانۀ کشف‌رود به‌عنوان حیاتی‌ترین شریان دشت مشهد وابسته بوده و با مدلی خطی در حاشیۀ این رودخانه شکل‌گرفته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Preliminary Understanding of the Developments and Settlement Pattern of the Late Bronze Age Kashfarud Basin (Mashhad plain)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Basafa 1
  • Mohammad -Sadegh Davari 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Neishabour University, Neishabour, Iran.
2 Master of Archeology, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Between 1800 and 1700 BC, complex urban centers in the eastern half of Iran, especially in the Northeast and Central Asia, collapsed due to unknown factors; While in Balkh and Merv oases, the settlements of this period appeared with the prominent culture of Balkh-Merv and continued without interruption. According to current knowledge, settlements in northeastern Iran, including Khorasan, Gorgan plain and Shahroud, were abandoned in 1700 BC and despite a period of decline, they continued again in the Iron Age with the emergence of cemeteries. Assessing these developments in Kashaf-Rud Basin as one of the cultural regions of Khorasan is one of the goals and necessity of studies in this period. Assessing the time phase of the Late Bronze Age and the dominant culture of the Kashaf-Rud Basin and how the developments of this period occurred in the region is one of the main research questions. On the other hand, understanding the pattern of settlements of the Late Bronze Age of Kashaf-Rud basin is one of the most important goals of the research. This research has been done with a landscape archeology approach and by analyzing ArcGIS output maps. The results show the similarity of the pottery characteristics of the Late Bronze Age Kashaf-Rud basin with the two time phases of Gonor and Togholog and the samples of Gonur Depe pottery of Turkmenistan and Jarkutan, Uzbekistan. The number of settlements has not decreased and new settlements have been inhabited for the first time in this period. The results also indicate the continuation of settlement and change in the type of livelihood of some settlement communities in this period. The settlements of this period, like the previous cultural periods, are strongly dependent on the Kashaf-Rud River as the most vital artery of the Mashhad plain and have been formed with a linear model along this river.
Keywords: Khorasan, Kashaf-Rud Basin, Mashhad Plain, Late Bronze Age, BMAC.
 
Introduction
The period of the second half of the second millennium BC (around 1800-1700 BC) coincides with the collapse of complex urban centers in the eastern half of the Iranian plateau, especially in the northeast. In the middle and southwest of Central Asia, after the mentioned change, the establishment of sites continued, which is known as the BMAC culture (Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex). According to the current archaeological knowledge in the northeast of Iran, including Khorasan, Gorgan plain and Shahroud, the settlements were abandoned around 1700 BC and despite a period of decline, they continued again in the Iron Age with the emergence of cemeteries. Unlike southwestern Central Asia, which has extensive archaeological studies and, in addition to cultural sequencing, other studies with approaches to social, economic, and interdisciplinary archeology; The current understanding of the prehistoric cultures of the Khorasan region is not the same in all sectors; Accordingly, prehistoric research in Khorasan can provide basic information and contribute to a general understanding of the archeology of the plateaus of Iran and Central Asia.
 
Objectives and Necessity
Due to the lack of purposeful research in Khorasan and recent findings in the region, a preliminary understanding of the cultural components of the new Bronze Age as the most problematic cultural period in Khorasan and Central Asia along with the introduction of this period as a statistical population for further studies. The future can open a new window for methodical and long-term studies in Khorasan, which may be overshadowed by the purposeful study of these settlements, the developments of this period in Central Asia.
Questions and Hypotheses: The initial evaluation of the New Bronze Age and the dominant culture of Kashfarud Basin, as well as how the developments of this period occurred in the region is one of the main research questions. According to the initial hypotheses, the developments of the New Bronze Age in Kashfarud Basin are of a different nature from other cultural regions of Khorasan and Northeast of Iran as well as Central Asia, so that although some Middle Bronze Age settlements are abandoned, but new settlements, although with The smaller area appeared for the first time in the New Bronze Age, and its cultural materials, including pottery, indicate homogeneity with the Central Asian settlements in the two famous phases of Gonur and Toguluq, as well as the two settlements of Gonur Depe and Jarkotan, which have been confirmed by the present research.’
 
Research Background
In the period of the present study, Kashfarud river basin lacks purposeful studies and most of the archaeological activities of the region consist of several studies and recordings that have been done in Kashfarud catchment area and form the history of archaeological research in this cultural area. (Labaf Khaniki, 2012: 137-158). Among these, only two prehistoric review and identification projects have been carried out in the city of Mashhad, which include surveys along the Kashfarud River (Ariai & Thibault, 1977) and the survey and identification of Mashhad (Labaf Khaniki 2012: 137-148). Methods: In the present study, the comparative approach of pottery traditions has been studied and in addition, by interpreting and analyzing ArcGIS output maps, environmental factors affecting the formation and continuity of settlements in this period have been studied. Theoretical foundations: In the second half of the second millennium BC in the oasis of Merv in modern Turkmenistan, changes occur in human societies and rapidly move to the east and affect the oasis of Balkh in northern Afghanistan and lead to the formation of a culture called BMAC (Sarianidi 1998: 35). Its chronological scale starts from 2300 or 2200 and ends until 1700 BC in Balkh and Merv oases, but in the eastern half of Central Asia and Khorasan, the settlement continues until the middle of the second millennium BC (1500 BC) until the Tahirbay phase (Basafa, 1394; Vahdati, 1394: 44).
 
Research Achievement
14 prehistoric settlements have been identified in the Kashfarud catchment area within the city of Mashhad (Mashhad plain). Of these, 4 settlements have been introduced as settlements that appeared in the Iron Age (Mazari-Moghaddam, 2016) which in pottery species are similar to the pottery traditions of the new Bronze Age called BMAC culture, which are in the cultural phase and similar to Jarkotan samples. Therefore, considering these pottery traditions as examples of the Late Bronze Age, a total of 10 settlements have surface cultural materials (pottery) from the Late Bronze Age and are similar to the BMAC culture.
 
Settlement Pattern
Two groups of sites are distinguishable in terms of location relative to altitude above sea level; Areas that are located at an altitude between 933-633 meters above sea level (5 settlements - 50%) and areas that are located at an altitude of 1300-1666 meters above sea level (5 settlements - 50%). All settlements of the late bronze period of Mashhad plain are located in the plain area and often close to the river. The 7 settlements studied (70%) are located in the range of 6 degree and 3 settlements (30%) are located in the slope of 6 degrees to 13 degrees. Between the 10 settlements that have been studied, 9 settlements (90%) are located less than 500 meters from the Kashfarud River and its tributaries and only one crescent hill settlement is located approximately 1 km from the river. All the studied settlements tend to focus on the rangelands of the region and its proximity to agricultural lands.
 
Conclusion
According to the evaluation of biological variables, Kashfarud River, as the most vital surface water artery of Mashhad plain, has always attracted human societies of different eras by creating a fertile ecosystem from the Paleolithic period to the contemporary period. Also, according to current knowledge and lack of identification of settlements in the highlands of the region, Kashfarud River is the most effective environmental factor in creating human habitats. The studied settlements with a linear model in its margins as two northwestern settlement clusters including Tape Ghader Abad, Abarghan site, Tape Devin with the axis of the tree canopy and the southeastern cluster, including Tape Qolur khaneh, Tape Gash, Tape Helali, Tape Shar shar and Tape Khaki, has been formed with the axis of Tape Naderi in Torogh city. The proximity of all settlements to the river, location in agricultural lands and the lowest slope of the region is not conclusive evidence of the pattern of settlement and livelihood based on agriculture of these settlements, but by examining the extent of some southeastern clusters such as Tape Crescent, Tape Shar shar and Tape Khaki And the absence of any cultural materials except pottery, these settlements can be considered semi-nomadic or seasonal with a livelihood based on livestock and seasonal agriculture. According to the present study, the studied pottery species indicate the synchronicity of the settlements of the Late Bronze period of Mashhad plain, coinciding with the two phases of BMAC culture, namely the phase of Gonur (Middle Bronze) and the phase of Toghulogh and Taherbai (Late Bronze) have been abandoned in 1700 BC and have adapted to the developments of this period and have been inhabited until 1500 BC and early Iron Age. With these interpretations, 5 settlements out of 10 studied settlements have been abandoned at the end of the Late Bronze Age. Based on the homogeneity of the pottery of these settlements with the samples of Toghlugh and Tahirabay phases, its date can be considered 1500 BC and Iron Age did not continue in these settlements. Definitely related to the Iron Age, not found from the surface of these settlements. In addition, according to current knowledge and typology of surface pottery, settlement in Tape Naderi and Tape Devin have have been continued from the Late Bronze Age to the Yaz I cultural period (1500 BC).
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Khorasan
  • Kashaf-Rud Basin
  • Mashhad Plain
  • Late Bronze Age
  • BMAC
- باصفا، حسن؛ و رضایی، محمدحسین، 1393، «گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تدقیق عرصۀ استقرار پیش‌ازتاریخی چناران». خلاصۀ مقالات دوازدهمین گردهمایی سالانۀ باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی.
- حبیبی، سید خلیل؛ شیخ‌بگلو اسلام، بابک؛ عشقی، علی‌اکبر؛ و طغرایی، محمود، 1394، «شواهد فرهنگ‌های پیش‌ازتاریخی آسیای مرکزی در منطقه شمال‌شرقی ایران براساس بررسی روشمند تپه نادری طرق». دومین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، موزۀ بزرگ خراسان: مشهد.
- رهنمایی، محمدتقی، 1370، توان‌های محیطی ایران. مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران.
- داوری، محمدصادق، 1395، «تبیین گاهنگاری نسبی و مطالعات سنجش از راه دور به‌منظور تحلیل چشم‌انداز فرهنگی و جغرافیایی محوطه‌های پیش‌ازتاریخ حوضۀ کشف‌رود (شهرستان مشهد) از دورۀ نوسنگی تا مفرغ پایانی». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور: نیشابور (منتشر نشده).
- داوری، محمدصادق؛ باصفا، حسن؛ و طغرایی، محمود، 1399، «تبیین گاهنگاری نسبی استقرارها و ارزیابی نظام‌های فرهنگی پیش‎از تاریخ حوضۀ کشف‎رود (دشت‌ مشهد) از دورۀ نوسنگی تا مفرغ میانی». مطالعات باستان شناسی، شمارۀ 12(3)، صص: 41-63. doi: 10.22059/jarcs.2020.290461.142792.
- دهقان، پوریا؛ پور‌مقدم، حسین؛ لشکری‌پور، مرتضی؛ و غفوری، م.، 1392، «بررسی اشکال ژئومورفولوژی حوضۀ آبریز کشف‌رود» مجموعه مقالات هشتمین مجمع زمین شناسی مهندسی و محیط‌زیست ایران. مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی، صص: 1659-1666.
- سروش، محمدرضا؛ و یوسفی، صاحب، 1393. «محوطۀ رزه، شاهدی از استقرارهای هزارۀ سوم تا دوران تاریخی در خراسان جنوبی». خلاصه مقالات دوازدهمین گردهمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران. تهران: پژوهشگاه سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
- سیدسجادی، سید منصور. 1395. باستان‌شناسی آسیای مرکزی، ج اول، انتشارات سمت. تهران.
- عبدی، کامیار، 1380، «زیست بوم شناسی انسانی و اهمیت آن در پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناختی». مجلۀ باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، شمارۀ 1، صص: 15-25.
- علیزاده، عباس، 1383، «نظریه و عمل در باستان‌شناسی». گزارش‌های باستان‌شناسی 3، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری.
- کوهل، فیلیپ ال، 1394. باستان‌شناسی آسیای مرکزی از دورۀ پارینه‌سنگی تا عصرآهن. مترجمان: رمضان‌پور، حسین و مرادیان، معصومه، انتشارات سمیرا. تهران.
- لباف‌خانیکی، رجبعلی، 1391، «مرور فعالیت‌های خراسان بزرگ از آغاز تا کنون». مجموعه مقالات همایش هشتاد سال باستان‌شناسی ایران. پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری، تهران، صص: 137-158.
- لباف‌خانیکی، میثم، 1385، «باستان‌شناسی زمین‌سیما». مجلۀ باستان‌شناسی، سال 2، صص: 113-126.
- مزاری‌مقدم، حسین، 1395، «تحلیل چشم‌انداز فرهنگی و الگوهای استقرار عصرآهن دشت مشهد (حوضۀ کشف‌رود)». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور (منتشرنشده).
- وحدتی، علی‌اکبر، 1394، «عصر مفرغ و آهن در خراسان (3000 تا 500 ق.م.). گذری بر باستان‌شناسی خراسان؛ گزیده‌ای از یافته‌های باستان‌شناختی و نفایس تاریخی-فرهنگی خراسان (به‌کوشش: میثم لباف‌خانیکی)». روابط عمومی و مرکز نشر امور فرهنگی با همکاری معاونت میراث‌فرهنگی، صص: 37-47.
- وحدتی، علی‌اکبر؛ و بیشونه، رافائل، 1391. «شواهد جدیدی از مجموعه باستان‌شناختی باختر-مرو در دشت جاجرم، خراسان شمالی». یازدهمین گردهمایی سالانۀ باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: پژوهشگاه سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
- هیبرت، فردریک؛ و دایسون، رابرت، 1385، نیشابور پیش‌ازتاریخ و مناطق مرزی بین ایران و آسیای مرکزی. ترجمۀ تقوی، عابد، مجلۀ باستان‌پژوهی، شمارۀ 14، صص: 24-45.
 
- Abdi, K., 2002, “Human ecology and its importance in archaeological research”. Bastanshenasi va Tarikh, No. 1, Pp: 15-25, (In Persian).
- Alizadeh, A., 2003, “Theory and practice in archeology”. Gozareshhaye Bastanshenasi, No. 3, Tehran: ICHTO,  (In Persian).
- Ariai,A. & Thibult, C., 1977, “Nouvelles Precistions A Propos De L outillage Paleolithique Ancinesur Golets u Khorassan (IRAN)”. Paleorient, Vol. 3, (1975-1976-1977), Pp:196.
- Askarov, A., 1992, “The Beginning of the Iron Age in Transoxiana”. In: History of Civilization of Central Asia, Vol. I, Edited by: A.H. Dani and V.M. Mason, Unesco Publishing, 441-459.
- Basafa, H. & Rezaei, M. H., 2014, “Evidence of Cheshmeh Ali Culture in Chenaran Plain (Northeastern Iran)”. Archaeology, No. 1, Pp:10-15.
- Basafa, H. & Rezaei, M. H., 2015, “Archaeological excavations at Chenaran site”. Abstracts of the Twelfth Annual Archaeological Conference of Iran. Tehran: ICHTO (In Persian).
- Biscione, R., 1977, “The crisis of the Central Asia Urbanization in II Millennium B.C. and Villages as an Alternative System”. Le Plateau Iranien et lAsie Centrale des Origines a la Conquele Islamique, Paris, Pp: 113-127.
- Boucharlat, R,; Francfort, H. P. & Lecomte, O., 2005, “The Citadel of Ulug depe and The Iron Age Archaeological Sequence in Southern Central Asia”. Iranica Antiqua, Vol. XL, Pp: 479-514.
- Davari. M. S., 2015, “Explaining the relative chronology and remote sensing studies in order to analyze the cultural and geographical landscape of the prehistoric sites of Kashafrud Basin (Mashhad city) from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age”. Master Thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Neyshabour University (unpublished), (In Persian).
- Dehghan, P.; Moghadam, H.; Lashkaripur, M. & Ghafori, M., 1392, “Investigation of geomorphological forms of Kashafrud catchment”. Proceedings of the 8th Iranian Society of Engineering Geology and Environment, Pp: 1659-1666, (In Persian).
- Habibi. S. KH.; Sheikh Baglu, B.; Eshghi. A. A. & Toghrae. M., 2016, “Evidence of prehistoric cultures of Central Asia in the northeastern region of Iran based on a methodical study of Tape Naderi”. The Second National Archaeological Conference of Iran. Mashhad (In Persian).
- Hiebert, 1995, “South Asia from a Central Asian perspective, The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language”. Material Culture and Ethnicity, Pp: 192-205.
- Hiebert. F. & Dyson. R., 2007, “Prehistoric Nishapur and the frontier between Central Asia and Iran”. Translated by: M. Dana. Bastanpazhohi, No. 14, Pp: 24-45, (In Persian).
- Jamialahmadi, M.; Nasab, H. V.; Nashli, H. F. & Beshkani, A., 2008, “Kashafrud revisited: discovery of new Palaeolithic sites in north-eastern Iran”. Antiquity, No. 82(317).
- Khlopina, K. I., 1981, “Namazga-Depe and the Late Bronze Age of Southern Turkmenia, in KOHL, P.L., The Bronze Age Civilization of Central Asia”. Recent Soviet Discoveries, New York, Pp: 35-62.
- Kohl, P., 1984, Central Asia: Paleolithic beginnings to the Iron Age.Editions Recherchésure les civilizations, Paris.
- Kohl, P., 2016, Central Asia: Paleolithic beginnings to the Iron Age. Translated by: H. Ramezanpur. M. Moradiyan. Tehran, Samira, (In Persian).
- Labaf Khaniki, R. A., 2012, “Review of the activities of Greater Khorasan from the begin-ning until now”. Proceedings of the Conference on Eighty Years of Iranian Archeology. ICHTO, Pp: 137-185 (In Persian).
- Labaf, M., 2007, “Landscape Archaeology”. Bastanshenasi, No. 2, Pp: 113-126 (In Persian).
- Lhuilier, J., 2019, “The Settlement Pattern in Central Asia during the Early Iron Age”. (Edited by: Christoph Baumer and Mirko Novák)Urban Cultures of Central Asia from the Bronze Age to the Karakhanids. Harrassowitz Verlag· Wiesbaden.
- Lhuilier, J. & Sarmiento, J. B., 2018, “Central Asia and the Interaction between the Iranian Plateau and the Steppes in Late First Millennium BC, Case Study from Ulug-depe in Turkmenistan”. Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia, No. 24, Pp: 331-353.
- Lhuilier, J., 2013, “Les Cultures ‘A Ceramique Modelee Peint’ en Asie Centrale: Un Apercu De L,Assemblage Ceramique de La Deuxieme Moitie Du 2e Millenaire AV.N.E.”. Iranica Antiqua, Vol. XLVIII, Pp: 103-146.
- Masson, V. M. & Sarianidi, V. I., 1972, Central Asia (Vol. 79). Thames and Hudson.
- Mazāri Moghadam, H., 2016, “Analysis of cultural landscape and settlement pattern of Iron Age sites in Kashafarud (Mashhad plain, A Master thesis of Archaeology”, University of Neyshabur, (In Persian)
- Rahnamayi, M. T., 1992, Iran’s environmental capabilities. Tehran: Markaz Motaleate Maskan (In Persian).
- Sadegh Davari, M.; Basafa, H. & toghraei, M., 2020, “Kashafrud River (Mashhad plain)from the Neolithic to the Middle Bronze Age”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, No. 12(3), Pp: 41-63. doi: 10.22059/jarcs.2020.290461.142792. (In Persian).
- Sajjadi, S. S., 1395, Archaeology of central Asia. Tehran: Samt, (In Persian)
- Sarianidi, V., 1998, Margiana and Protozoroastrism. Athènes.
- Sarianidi, V., 1972, Central Asia. Turkmenia before the Achaemenids.
- Sarianidi, V., 2007, Necropolis of Gonur. Kapton Editions, Athens, Greece.
- Soroush, M. & Yousefi, S., 2014, “Razeh area, a witness from the settlements of the third millennium to the historical period in South Khorasan”. Short Articles of the Twelfth Annual Iranian Archaeological Conference. Editor: Kourosh Roustaei and Mehran Gholami. Teh-ran: Archaeological Research Institute, Pp: 271-273, (In Persian).
- Vahdati, A. A. & Biscione, R., 2013, “New evidence of BMAC in Jajarm Plain”. 11th Annual Iranian Ar-chaeological Conference, Tehran: ICHTO, (In Persian).
- Vahdati. A. A., 2016, “Khorasan in the Bronze and Iron Age”. Gozari bar Bastanshenasi Khorasan (ICHTO), Pp: 37-47, (In Persian).
- Vahdati, A. A., 2019, “The Early Iron Age in northern Khorāsān”. Archaologie in Iran und Turan(17), Vol. XXXV, Pp: 51-66.