مطالعۀ آئین پیشاتاریخی سوگ سیاوش با کمک اسناد باستان‌شناختی منطقۀ سغدیانا با رویکرد آیکونولوژی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشکدۀ هنر، دانشگاه نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران

2 استادیار گروه ارتباطات تصویری، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران (نویسندۀ مسئول).

10.22084/nb.2023.27785.2586

چکیده

منطقۀ ‌سغدیانا از مراکز مهم تاریخی-فرهنگی موردتوجه در حوزۀ مطالعات تاریخ هنر و باستان‌شناحتی ایرانی بوده و در این‌میان، فرهنگ حماسی-مذهبی این منطقه واجد اهمیت دوچندان است. داستان «سوگ سیاوش» از مهم‌ترین این روایت‌های حماسی-مذهبی بوده و می‌توان رد بسیاری از آئین‌های کهن مرتبط با سوگ را در این روایت‌ها و هم‌چنین سنت تصویری مرتبط با آن‌ها تشخیص داد. ریشه‌های معنایی سوگ را می‌توان از خلال این تصاویر بررسی کرد. در پژوهش حاضر با ارجاع به دیوارنگارۀ پنجکنت منتسب به سوگ سیاوش، سعی‌در مطالعۀ چرایی استمرار و بقای انگاره-تصویر سوگ شده است. بدین‌منظور، از روش آیکونولوژی «اروین پانوفسکی» استفاده می‌شود. این روش به ما کمک می‌کند تا با «توصیف»، «تحلیل» و «تفسیر» این دیوارنگاره و تطبیق آن با دیگر اسناد تصویری مرتبط به خوانشی نو از انگارۀ سوگ دست‌یابیم. پرسش اصلی این است که، حضور انگارۀ سوگ و استمرار آن در تاریخ و فرهنگ ایران به چه طریق بوده است؟ هدف از این پرسش، در درجۀ اول مطالعۀ تاریخی-فرهنگی معنای سوگ و پی‌گیری استمرار این انگاره از خلال تصاویر مرتبط با آن است. براساس اسناد مکتوب و شواهد تصویری، در ایران باستان سوگواری در عزای مردگان و پهلوانان به اشکال مختلف مرسوم بوده و نشانه‌های آن‌را در کنش‌هایی چون: گریستن، موی کندن، روی خراشیدن، سیاه پوشیدن و... نزد آئین‌ورزان می‌توان مشاهده کرد. بدیهی است که در آئین سوگواری افراد حاضر در مراسم با نوعی حضور مدام، این اعمال را تکرار می‌کردند. پژوهش حاضر، ضمن پرداختن به مسأله سوگ، این استمرار را از خلال مطالعۀ دیوارنگارۀ پنجکنت و تطبیق آن با دیگر اسناد باستان‌شناختی منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی مورد بررسی قرار می‌دهد. این پژوهش، براساس هدف بنیادی و از منظر روش، توصیفی-تحلیلی است. داده‌های اولیۀ پژوهش حاضر نیز از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و اسناد باستان‌شناختی فراهم آمده‌اند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of the Prehistoric Mourning Ritual of Siavash with the Help of Archaeological Documents of the Sogdiana Region with an Iconological Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Qadernezhad 1
  • Mahboobeh Akbari Naseri 2
2 Assistant Professor, Video Communication Department, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran (Corresponding Author)
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The region of Sogdiana is recognized as a vital historical and cultural center within the ancient Iranian geographical landscape. This area has garnered the interest of scholars from diverse archaeological viewpoints. The relationship between the religious-narrative culture of Sogdiana and its artistic traditions is particularly noteworthy. Central to this discourse is the narrative of Siavash and mourning for him, which is one of the key religious-ritual stories, showcasing remnants of various ancient mourning practices. Beyond the realm of religious and literary sources, aspects of our historical visual tradition also reflect this narrative, enabling an analysis of the semantic and religious origins of this ritual through these artistic depictions. This article examines the Panjkent wall painting associated with Siavash’s mourning, aiming to analyze this ritual as a significant historical and cultural representation. To achieve this, the study employs Irwin Panofsky’s iconological approach, which proves beneficial in the fields of archaeology, art history, and visual studies. This methodology facilitates the “description,” “analysis,” and “interpretation” of the wall painting, allowing for a comparative exploration with other visual artifacts that contribute to a fresh understanding of the mourning concept. The objective of the present research is to address the central inquiry: “How has the concept of mourning manifested and persisted throughout the history and culture of the Iranian people?” This inquiry aims to explore the historical and cultural significance of mourning while tracing the evolution of this concept through associated imagery. By concentrating on the meanings and historical roots of mourning as depicted in visual representations, this study facilitates an examination of the motifs and gestures of various figures, thereby enabling a broader analysis. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, aligned with its fundamental aims, and employs a methodological framework that incorporates both visual and textual sources obtained through library research and archaeological findings.
Keywords: Archaeology of Central Asia, Sogdiana, Iconology, Mourning for Siavash, Panjkent Wall Paintings, Continuity.
 
Introduction
The structured rituals associated with mourning and death represent a longstanding and expansive area of inquiry, generating considerable discussion among scholars. The narrative of Siavash, along with the mourning practices linked to him, has been transmitted from ancient times through both religious and epic literature. It appears that, despite the passage of time, the essence of mourning has persisted in various representations and ideas, thereby shaping the entirety of this ritualistic practice. Consequently, the mourning rituals and symbols in ancient Iran have maintained their foundational frameworks throughout history. This article employs Panofsky’s iconology approach to explore the underlying meanings of mourning and its associated symbolic concepts.
The examination of existing visual artifacts and textual records indicates that in ancient Iran, various forms of mourning for the deceased and heroes were prevalent. The practices associated with mourning, such as hair pulling, cutting, scratching, weeping, and the donning of black attire, were integral to these rituals performed by mourners. This research aims to explore the concept of mourning, particularly in relation to the mourning of Siavash. This review seeks to investigate the phenomenon of mourning and to analyze the cultural framework that supports such expressions of grief. To achieve this, it will delve into the themes of repetition and continuity as depicted in mourning imagery, with a specific focus on the mural from Panjkent. The portrayal of mourning in Panjkent is not simply a visual representation; it embodies a deeper cultural significance. This article aims to address the question: “In what ways has the concept of mourning persisted and evolved throughout the history and culture of the Iranian people?” Our intention is to uncover the continuity of an ancient religious tradition by analyzing mourning imagery. This investigation seeks to understand both the historical and cultural implications of mourning and to trace the ongoing representation of Siavash’s mourning within the framework of Iran’s archaeology. To facilitate this analysis and respond to the research question, we have utilized Panofsky’s method of iconology.
Article Text
The depiction of mourning for the hero in Panjkent features a variety of figures alongside a chamber or structure. Positioned on the right side of the image, and flanking Amari, are fourteen individuals who are engaged in the act of mourning while carrying a chamber or coffin To the left, three larger figures are also present, all of whom are depicted in a state of grief, inflicting injuries upon their heads and faces. It is important to note that the mourning of Siavash has its roots in Iranian-Central Asian traditions, with influences from Mesopotamia, as well as Eastern and Greek cultures. This article emphasizes the Central Asian origins of this mourning practice. A notable aspect of the rituals surrounding the death of the martyred god is the emergence of secretive learning ceremonies that develop around his persona posthumously. This establishment of enigmatic rituals is a distinctive feature of mourning for Siavash, characterized by expressions of lamentation, weeping, and bodily harm, which have persisted over the centuries. This practice represents the initial gesture or thematic element encountered in the Panjkent. The public’s conviction in empathy and engagement during mourning is pivotal to the mourning scene, fostering a connection with the hero depicted and ensuring the endurance and recurrence of this ritual through the actions of ritual practitioners across generations. Additionally, the mourning iconography is enhanced and sustained by various gestures and symbolic elements. A significant aspect to consider in the representation of mourning is the use of black; this is evident in the attire of the ritualists and the presence of a black horse within the scene. The choice of black clothing by the ritualists can be interpreted as an effort to forge a sense of unity that resonates with the hero’s narrative. In this context, the rituals and their practices serve as a means to facilitate this connection. By engaging in these rituals and partaking in the specific mourning rites for the Shah-Martyr, individuals participate in a continuum that transcends time, re-enacting a sacred event within an eternal framework. The persistence of the icon, reflected in the postures of the figures, their meanings, and the imagery, illustrates the self-reinforcement and preservation of the ritual within cultural and historical contexts.
Conclusion
Following the demise of Siavash, his commemoration as a hero-god was sustained through a confluence of cultural, historical, and ritual-religious factors that ensured the persistence of his image. This continuity manifested across various regions of Iran, extending into Central Asia. The depiction found in the Panjkent wall painting, while ostensibly illustrating the death of Siavash, the god-martyr, serves as a representation of an enduring archetype, accompanied by corresponding ceremonial practices. The application of Panofsky’s iconological approach facilitates a deeper understanding of this imagery and the associated mourning gestures. Through this analytical lens, we can discern the recurring themes present in these images and texts that have traversed time and geography, highlighting the resurgence of ancient myths and rituals in different eras. Furthermore, many actions performed by mourners, such as weeping, donning black attire, and the ritualistic cutting of hair and faces, can be interpreted as expressions of solidarity with the hero. This desire for unity with the hero is a profound aspect of human experience, manifesting in diverse forms throughout.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Archaeology of Central Asia
  • Sogdiana
  • Iconology
  • Mourning for Siavash
  • Panjkent Wall Paintings
  • Continuity
- الیاده، میرچا، (1379). رساله در تاریخ ادیان. ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران: سروش.
- ابی‌الخیر، ایرانشاه(1370). بهمن‌نامه. ویراستۀ رحیم عفیفی، تهران: انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
- بهار، مهرداد، (1378). پژوهشی در اساطیر ایران. تهران: آگه.
- بهار، مهرداد، (1374). گفتاری چند در فرهنگ ایران. تهران: فکر روز.
- بارتولومه، کریستیان؛ و قریب، بدرالزمان، (1383). فرهنگ ایران باستان به انضمام ذیل آن. تهران: انتشارات اساطیر.
- بیضایی، بهرام، (1385). نمایش در ایران. تهران: انتشارات روشنگران و مطالعات زنان.
- بختیاری، علیقلی، (1361). تاریخ بختیاری. تهران: یساولی.
- پولاک، یاکوب، (1361). سفرنامۀ پولاک. ترجمۀ کیکاووس جهانداری، تهران: خوارزمی.
- پورداوود، مهرداد، (1356). یسنا. بخش دوم، تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
- تفضلی، احمد، (1384). ترجمه و تحقیق مینوی خرد. تهران: توس. 
- چلکووسکی، پیتر جی، (1367). تعزیه: هنر بومی پیشرو ایران. ترجمۀ داوود حاتمی، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
- حصوری، علی، (1384). سیاوشان. تهران: نشر چشمه.
- رضی، هاشم، (1381). دانشنامۀ ایران باستان. تهران: انتشارات سخن.
- رمضانی، محمد، (1315). هزار و یک‌شب. جلد 1، تهران: انتشارات کلاله خاور.
- دادگی، فرنبغ، (1369). بندهشن. ترجمۀ مهرداد بهار، تهران: توس.
- فردوسی، ابوالقاسم، (1366). شاهنامه. به‌کوشش: جلال خالقی‌مطلق، دفتر اول، کالیفرنیا: بنیاد میراث ایران.
- فردوسی، ابوالقاسم، (1369). شاهنامه. به‌کوشش: جلال خالقی‌مطلق، دفتر دوم، کالیفرنیا: بنیاد میراث ایران.
- فرای، ریچارد نلسون، (1386). میراث باستانی ایران. ترجمۀ مسعود رجب‌نیا، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
- فرامکین، گرگوار، (1372). باستان‌شناسی در آسیای میانه. ترجمۀ صادق ملک‌شهمیرزادی، تهران: انتشارات وزارت امور خارجه.
- کیا، خجسته، (1371). سخنان سزاوار زنان در شاهنامه. تهران: نشر فاخته.
- کریستن‌سن، آرتور، (1381). کیانیان. ترجمۀ ذبیح‌الله صفا، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
- گروسه، رنه، (1364). تمدن ایرانی. ترجمۀ عیسی بهنام، تهران: بنگاه نشر و ترجمه کتاب.
- مسکوب، شاهرخ، (1386). سوگ سیاوش. تهران: خوارزمی.
- نرشخی، ابوبکر محمد ابن جعفر، (1351). تاریخ بخارا. تصحیح: مدرس رضوی، تهران: انتشارات بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
- نصری، امیر، (1388). حکمت شمایل‌های مسیحی. تهران: نشر چشمه.
- هدایت، صادق، (1334). نوشته‌های پراکنده. به‌کوشش: حسن قائمیان، تهران: امیرکبیر.
- Azarpay, G., (1981). Sogdian Painting: The Pictorial Epic in Oriental Art. USA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520333727
- Abi al-Khair, I., (1991). Bahmannameh. Edited by: Rahim Afifi, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian).
- Bahar, M., (1999). A Research in Iranian Mythology. Tehran: Agah. (in Persian).
- Bartholomeh, C. & Qarib, B., (2004). Ancient Iranian Culture. Tehran: Asatir. (in Persian).
- Baizaei, B., (2015). Theater in Iran. Tehran: Entesharate Roshangaran. (in Persian).
- Bakhtiari, A., (1982). History of Bakhtiari. Tehran: Yesavali. (in Persian).
- Bartholome, Ch., (1961). Altiranisches worterbuche. Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111471778
- Chanda, J., (1998). “Art History Inquiry Methods”. Art Education, 51 (5): 17- 24.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3193717
- Compareti, M., (2011). The Painted Vase of Merv in the Context of, Central Asian Pre-Islamic Funerary Tradition. Silk Road, vol. 9, USA.
- Chelkovski, P., (2017). Ta'ziyeh: The Leading Native Art of Iran. Translated by: Dawood Hatami, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian).
- Christensen, A., (2002). Kianian. Translated by: Zabihollah Safa, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian).
- Daryaee, T. & Malekzadeh, S., (2014). “The Performance of Pain and Remembrance in Late Ancient Iran”. The Silk Road, 12: 57-64.
- D'Alleva, A., (2005). Methods & Theories of Art History. London: Laurence King Publishing.
- Diers, M., (1995). “Warburg and the Warburgian Tradition of cultural History”. New German Critique, Cultural Studies: 65: 59-73.
- Eliadeh, M., (2000). Treatise on the History of Religions. Translated by: Jalal Sattari, Tehran: Soroush. (in Persian).
- Ferdowsi, A., (1987). Shahnameh. By: The effort of Jalal Khaleghi Mutlaq, California: Bonyade Mirathe Iran. (in Persian).
- Ferdowsi, A., (1990). Shahnameh. By: The effort of Jalal Khaleghi Mutlaq, California: Bonyade Mirathe Iran. (in Persian).
- Fry, R., (2007). Ancient Heritage of Iran. Translated by: Masoud Rajabnia, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian).
- Framkin, G., (1993). Archeology in Central Asia. Translated by: Sadegh Malek Shahmirzadi, Tehran: Entesharate Wezarate Kharejeh. (in Persian).
- Grooseh, R., (1985). Iranian Civilization. Translated by: Isa Behnam, Tehran: Bongahe Nashr va Tarjomeh Ketab. (in Persian).
- Heidel, A., (1963). The Gilgamesh Epic and Old Testament Parallels. Chicago.
- Hasouri, A., (2005). Siavshan. Tehran: Cheshmeh. (in Persian).
- Hedayat, S., (1955). Scattered Writings. By: Hasan Qaemian, Tehran: Amir-Kabir. (in Persian).
- Jin, X., (2019). “The Funerary Couch of An Jia and the Art of Sogdian Immigrants in Sixth Century China”. Burlington Magazine, 161: 820-829.
- Kia, K., (1992). Deserving Words of Women in Shahnameh. Tehran: Nashreh Fakhteh. (in Persian). 
- Lee, R. W., (1968). “Erwin Panofsky”. Art Journal, 27 (4): 368-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1968.10793851
- Lash, W. F., (1996). Iconography and Iconology in the Dictionary of Art. New York, Macmillan.
- Marshak, B. I., (2016). “PANJIKANT”. Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition.
- Mitchell, W. J., (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. London: University of Chicago.  https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148052.001.0001
- Maskoub, S., (2007). Siavash's Mourning. Tehran: kharazmi. (in Persian).
- Mongait, A. L. (1959). Archeology in USSR. Foreign Languages Publishing House.
- Narshakhi, A., (1972). Bokhara History. By: Modarres Razavi, Tehran: Bonyad Farhang Iran. (in Persian).
- Nasri, A., (2009). The wisdom of Christian Icons. Tehran: Cheshmeh. (in Persian).
- Panofsky, E., (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts. New York, Doubleday Anchor Books.
- Poolak, Y., (1982). Poolak's Travelogue. Translated by: Kikavos Jahandari, Tehran: Khwarazmi. (in Persian).
- Pourdawood, M., (1977). Yesna. Part II, Tehran: Tehran University Publications. (in Persian).
- Razi, H., (2002). Encyclopedia of Ancient Iran. Tehran: Sokhan. (in Persian).
- Ramezani, M., (1936). One Thousand and One Nights. Vol. 1, Tehran: Kalaleh Khavar. (in Persian).
- Rosenfield, J. M. (1967). The Dynasty Arts of Kushans. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520418066
- Shin, Un-Ch., (1990). “Panofsky, Polanyi, and Intrinsic Meaning”. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24 (4): 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333104
- Sims, E. M., Boris, I. & Grube, E. J., (2002). Peerless Images- Persian Painting its Sources. London.
- Shenkar, M., (2017). “The Religion and the Pantheon of the Sogdians in the Light of Their Sociopolitical Structures”. Journal Asiatique, 305 (2):  191-209. 
- Tafazoli, A., (2005). Translation and Research on Minoy Kherad. Tehran: Toos. (in Persian).
Yarshater, E., (1979). “Ta'ziyeh and Pre-Islamic Mourning Rites in Iran”. In: Ta'zeieyeh: Ritual Drama in Islam, Ed. Peter J. Chelkowski, New York, New York University.