شواهدی از کارکرد آئینی-روحانی صدف دریایی نوع کجک (Cowrie) در بافت های باستانی ایران از هزارۀ سوم تا پایان هزارۀ اول پیش ازمیلاد بر پایۀ رهیافت قوم باستان شناسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری باستان شناسی، گروه باستان شناسی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه باستان شناسی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22084/nb.2021.23478.2283

چکیده

پوستۀ سخت‌گونه‌ای از صدف‌های دریایی موسوم به «Cowrie» که در زبان فارسی به نام‌های متعدد ازجمله «کجک» یا «کوژک» و... نامیده می‌شود تاکنون در نهشت‌های باستانی فراوانی از هزارۀ سوم تا هزارۀ اول پیش‌ازمیلاد به‌دست‌آمده است، در تمامی گزارش‌های منتشره صرف همراهی این اشیاء با دیگر تزئینات شخصی آن‌ها را به‌عنوان «تزئینات شخصی» معرفی کرده‌اند؛ درحالی‌که این پرسش مطرح است که چگونه در طول زمانی بیش از پنج‌هزار سال این سنت تزئینی باقی‌مانده است و آیا با توجه به این‌که برخی اقوام بومی امروزی اعتقادی فراتر از جنبۀ زیبایی‌شناسی به صدف کوژک دارند؛ می‌توان این اعتقادات را بازماندۀ آئین‌های کهن‌تر محسوب نمود؟ بر این‌اساس این فرض مطرح می‌گردد که تداوم استفاده از یک شئ غیربومی در طول زمان مرتبط با یک امر آئینی-اعتقادی است چرا به‌طور هم‌زمان دامنۀ چنین پدیده‌ای به‌صورت استفاده در بافتارهای نیایشی و تدفینی نه‌فقط در مرزهای فرهنگی ایران، بلکه در مناطق وسیعی از حوزۀ لوانت شرقی و خاورمیانه نیز قبلاً گزارش‌شده است. مطالعۀ میدانی نشان می‌دهد که این اشیاء را صرفاً برای کودکان بدون توجه به جنسیت و در افراد بالغ صرفاً برای زنان به‌کار می‌گیرند که نشان از وجود نوعی تابوی جنسیتی و سنی برای آن است و اعتقاددارند همراهی این اشیاء با فرد علاوه‌بر جنبۀ زیبایی‌شناسی خاص، موجب دفع چشم‌زخم، رفع نحوست و جذب خیروبرکت می‌شوند. این پدیده در بافتارهای باستانی به‌صورت حضور کوژک‌ها در گورهای زنان و کودکان در گزارش‌های کاوش دیده می‌شود؛ اما هیچ نشانه‌ای برای کاربری این صدف‌ها به‌عنوان یک کالای منزلتی که تعلق به طبقۀ خاصی از افراد جامعه باشد دیده نشده است. ازنظر روش‌شناسی در این پژوهش از روش توصیفی-تاریخی و هم‌چنین روش قوم‌نگاری به‌صورت مشترک استفاده‌شده است در یک تجزیه‌وتحلیل تطبیقی روشن می‌شود که اهداف متصور برای این کجک‌ها در هر دو گروه، یعنی بافتارهای قوم‌شناسی امروزی و بافتارهای باستانی، مرتبط با نگرش آئینی و روحانی است.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evidence of the Ritual-Spiritual Function of Cowrie in the Ancient Tissues of Iran from the Third Millennium to the End of the First Millennium BC based on the Approach of the Ethnoarchaeology

نویسندگان [English]

  • parisa naseri 1
  • ABBAS MOTARJEM 2
1 PhD. Student in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
چکیده [English]

shell A type of seashell called Cowrie, which in Persian is called by several names such as “Gajak” or “Kojak” and... So far, in many ancient deposits from the third millennium BC to the first millennium BC, mainly in the form of personal ornaments with the deceased and in some cases from the places of worship in large numbers, has been obtained. In all published reports, the mere accompaniment of these objects with other personal ornaments has introduced them as personal ornaments, while the question arises as to how this decorative tradition has remained for more than five thousand years. Given that some of today’s indigenous peoples believe beyond the aesthetic aspect of shell; These beliefs can be considered remnants of more ancient rituals? Based on this, it is hypothesized that the continued use of a non-indigenous object over time is related to a religious-ritual belief. Why at the same time the scope of such a phenomenon in the form of use in prayer and burial contexts not only in the cultural borders of Iran but also in large areas of the Eastern Levant and the Middle East has already been reported. Field ethnographic study of some indigenous peoples in western and southwestern Iran shows that these objects are used only for children regardless of gender and in adults only for women, which indicates the existence of a kind of gender and age taboo for it and belief The association of these objects with the person, in addition to the special aesthetic aspect, causes the repulsion of an evil eye They eliminate imperfection and attract goodness and blessings. This phenomenon is seen in ancient textures in the form of shell in the graves of women and children in excavation reports. But there is no sign of the use of these shell as a dignified commodity that belongs to a certain class of people in society. In a comparative analysis on the goals envisaged for this Kajak in both the contexts of ethnology today and contexts of ancient attitude toward ritual and spiritual practice, this assumption is approved only aspects of belief has caused Kajak shell has been considered for a long time and have been transported as a precious commodity by a commercial network from the coasts of the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean to parts of the Iranian plateau.
Keywords: Archaeology of Death, Shell, Cowrie Shell, Ethnoarchaeology.
 
Introduction
The oyster is a species of marine life that is itself a member of a group of small to large marine gastropods of the family Cypraeidae, which are classified as “Cypraea”. The biological origin of this species belongs to the seas and does not exist in any river or lake. Unlike pottery and other man-made objects, this data is not used as part of the survival of living things, sometimes with slight modifications to their natural form, but discovered in a place other than their habitat and Archaeological deposits indicate that they have moved over long distances. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to clarify the reasons for the use and function of this finding among ancient deposits from the third millennium to the beginning of history on the plateau of Iran. From a methodological point of view, in this research, a comparative-comparative method is used to explain this finding among ancient deposits as an unknown part of the problem and Ethnoarchaeology and living folk deposits as a known part. Therefore, the basis of the study is based on comparative and field methods. The statistical population is the collection of archaeological information taken from all available sources, including archaeological excavation reports and published cases without emphasis on specific specimens in the period from the third millennium to the first millennium BC, and the main reason for focusing on the tribes of the western region. And southwestern Iran due to the greatest overlap of the biological area of these tribes with the range of ancient sites studied.
 
Research data
So far, as a result of many archaeological excavations in Iran, samples of Cowries shell have been obtained. From the Neolithic period, oyster type Kajak from Choghasfid site and Tape Ali kush in Dehloran plain (Hole, et all, 1969: 244) and Tape Haji Firooz in the south of Urmia lake (Voigt, 1983: 263) have been reported. Kajak type in many sites of ruralization and the beginning of urbanization, such as Tel Millian Fars (Reese, 2003b, 103), Shahre sokhte (2300 to 2800) (Durante, 1977: 335: 15–6, pl. 1), Tel Iblis (Evett, 1967: 216, 217: Fig. 7) Tape Yahya (Tosi & Biscione, 1981: 39, 67: nr. 52, 78: nr. 84) & (Cataliotti-Valdina, 1979: 90) and Kazabad Ilam (Stein, 1940: pl. X: 2–3.) Have also been reported. (Reese, 1989a: 80–81). Hull believes that in light of the prevalence of interregional trade in terms of the origin of certain commodities such as turquoise and obsidian, he has mentioned the existence of shell (Dentalium, Cowrie) as one of these commodities, while their biological origin is related to the Mediterranean Sea. And the Persian Gulf has been mentioned (Hole. et all. 1969: 53, 78, 244). On the other hand, in the excavations related to the Elamite sites and the Bronze Age cemeteries of the Pishkuh areas in the Zagros, the discovery of numerous specimens of Kajak shell; Shows that in the Iron Age of Poshtkuh in the cemeteries Pusht Kaboud, Katal Gal Gal (KT.A1, KT.A7, KT.A9, KT.A10, KT.A13 with 2, 23. 1. 4) (Overlet, 2003). ) And Bordbal (BB.1, BB.3 and BB.10) have also been reported as oyster gifts with the dead (Overlet, 2003). The latest finding is the presence of shell of the type in Zagros cemetery in Sanandaj (Amelirad et all, 2012, 96. Pi 39). In which the position of the shell as a kind of necklace with the deceased indicates its use as individual decorations. In today’s ethnographic contexts, among some Lor and Kurdish tribes, the oyster’s Kajak is used as a victim or’s repellent force to protect children from evil eyes, and sometimes it is combined with strings of pecan seeds and some teeth. Of the animals, it is often attached to the child’s shoulder with a locking pin or in front of the baby’s sugar headband (Tawfiqi 1393: 87). Kojak shell is also sewn on the bridle of horses and donkeys, as well as camel hats. The front of the horse saddle, which is strong and sturdy and is placed vertically, is often adorned with a shell (Pollack, 1989: 343). (Figure 5). Among the cattle breeders of Bakhtiari and Qashqai tribes and Kurds of the western region, they installed blue beads and shell on the musk tripod and the musk itself, and the shell is considered to mean the blessing of the day and the increase of musk butter. Also, in a study on knitted bedspreads of Qashqai nomads, a technique called oeiiy Weaving has been mentioned, on which often crooked shells have been installed to repel the evil eye (Tawfiqi, 2014: 47). Among the nomads of the Bakhtiari tribe, Kajak shell and blue beads are attached to children’s wooden cradles. Likewise, mothers who have just given birth wear it on their arms or put it on a ring. In Lorestan, blue or blue beads are called kujeh or khazf, and its large type is used to repel evil eye from animals; And of its smaller type, they seek help from children to ward off the evil eye  (Asadian Khorramabadi, 1353: 233), for example, among the Bakhtiari lors, there are  (black stone) and  (shell bead). These beads are embroidered on the baby’s outer garment or hat (Filberg, 1990: 221, 222).
 
Conclusion
Study and comparison of two discussions focusing on the use of Kajak shell in two different time frames, ie the third millennium to the first millennium BC and parts of modern local tribes in Iran confirm the signs of the use of this type of non-local shell. The oyster, which is the closest estimated source for those shores of the Persian Gulf in the south of the Iranian plateau, and sometimes the distance from the nearest coastal point to the cemeteries and areas from which these shells have been discovered and identified has been nearly a thousand kilometres. Historical and spatial analysis of the shell used according to the place of their discovery showed that the majority of them are related to two specific places, shrines and graves. The common denominator of these two contexts is related to the religious and cosmological thoughts and ideas of the people who removed them, and no doubt the components and objects within these spaces reflect their least religious value. The period is considered for the comfort of the deceased. This trend has been observed almost without interruption until the first half of the first millennium BC and simultaneously with the historical period of Iran. Eventually, since the formation of Islam as the official and dominant religion in most places, virtually all non-Islamic burial methods have become obsolete, and therefore the use of Kajak shell or any other decorative and ritual object in the grave has been eliminated, but ethnographic evidence shows that there are still signs of some beliefs and attitudes to this day, and in the meantime, the historical texts of the Islamic era confirm them, so that in many dictionaries such as Kanz al-Laghat from the eighth century AH is still a common belief of the people. Indicate the excretion of evil eyes by the white bead. The similar conditions of use of shell among some native tribes of modern Iran in the western and southwestern regions of Iran show that in both archaeological and ethnographic contexts, the use of this oyster is used only for women, children and no cases for men. Secondly, it has not been seen that in both contexts, the use of small shell has been used only for religious and decorative matters with religious meaning. For example, graves, temples and sacred spaces and the belief in repelling evil forces and wounded eyes fall into the category of religious affairs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Archaeology of Death
  • Shell
  • Cowrie Shell
  • Ethnoarchaeology
- ابن‌معروف محمد ابن، عبدالخالق، 1392، فرهنگ کنزاللغات عربی-فارسی. تصحیح: رضا علوی نصر، تهران: انتشارات مرتضویه.
- اسدیان‌خرم‌آبادی، محمد؛ باجلان‌فرخی، محمدحسین؛ و کیانی، منصور، 1358، باورها و دانسته‌ها در لرستان و ایلام. چاپ یکم، تهران: نشر فرهنگ و آموزش عالی.
- الیاده، میرچا، 1393، تصاویر و نمادها. ترجمۀ محمدکاظم مهاجری، چاپ دوم، تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب پارسه.
- الیاده، میرچا، 1394، رساله در تاریخ ادیان. ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، چاپ پنجم، تهران: نشر سروش.
- پولاک، یاکوب ادوارد، 1368، سفرنامۀ پولاک: ایران و ایرانیان. ترجمۀ کیکاووس جهانداری، چاپ یکم، تهران: نشر خوارزمی.
- توفیقی، پیوند، 1393، «بررسی تطبیقی طرح و رنگ در طناب‌های (مال‌بندهای) عشایری ایل‌های بختیاری و قشقایی». نشریۀ هنرهای کاربردی، ۳ (۵): ۴۵-۵۷.
- تناولی، پرویز، 1377، جل‌های عشایری و روستایی ایران آرایش اسب. چاپ یکم، تهران: انتشارات یساولی.
- جکسون، آبراهام لنتاین ویلیام، 1357، سفرنامۀ جکسون ایران درگذشته و حال. ترجمۀ منوچهر امیری و فریدون بدره‌ای، چاپ دوم، تهران: نشر شرکت سهامی انتشارات خوارزمی.
- حصوری، علی، ١٣٧١، نقش‌های قالی ترکمن و اقوام همسایه. چاپ یکم، تهران: نشر فرهنگان.
- دانلدسن، بس آلن، 1398، اسفند وحشی (پژوهشی در باب سحر و جادو در فرهنگ‌عامه ایران). ترجمۀ ابوالقاسم سری، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگ جاوید.
- رایس، کلارا کولیور، 1383، زنان ایرانی و راه و رسم زندگی آن‌ها. ترجمۀ اسدالله آزاد، چاپ یکم، تهران: نشر کتابدار .
- رضی، هاشم، 1381، دانش‌نامۀ ایران باستان، عصر اوستایی تا پایان دوران ساسانی. چاپ یکم، جلد سوم، تهران: نشر سخن.
- صابری، افتخاری عارفه، 1391، «باور به وجود نیروی فوق طبیعی در اشیاء در فرهنگ‌عامه مردم ایران (فتیشیزم = شئ باوری)». نشریۀ نامه انسان‌شناسی، ۱۰ (۱۷): ۸۷-۱۱۳.
- فیلبرگ، کا‌رل‌ گونا‌ر، 1369، ‌ایل‌ پا‌پی‌ کوچ‌نشینا‌ن‌ شمال‌غرب‌ ایران‌. ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی‌، تهران: نشر فرهنگسرا.
- فضایی، یوسف، 1356، بنیان‌های اجتماعی دین. چاپ اول، تهران: نشر شاه‌رضا.
- محمدحسین بن خلف تبریزی، 1391، دائرة‌المعارف برهان قاطع. تصحیح: محمد معین، چاپ هفتم، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
 
- Alarashi, H.; Ortiz, A. & Molist, M., 2018, “Sea shells on the riverside: Cowrie ornaments from the PPNB site of Tell Halula (Euphrates, northern Syria)”. Quaternary International, 490: 98-112.‏
- Amelirad, S.; Overlaet, B. & Haerinck, E., 2012, “The Iron Age “Zagros Graveyard” near Sanandaj (Iranian Kurdistan), Preliminary Report on the First Season”. Iranica Antiqua, 47: 41-99.‏
- Asdian Khorramabadi, M.; Bajanfarkhi, M. H. & Kayani, M., 1979, Bavarha Va Danestet Dar Lorestan Va Ilam. 1st edition, Tehran: Nashre Farhang and Amozesh Alli.
- Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E., 2000, “The economic importance of molluscs in the Levant”. Archaeozoology of the Near East IV, ARC Publications, 32: 218-227.
- Daniel, E. & Bar-Yosef, M., 2005, “The exploitation of shells as beads in the Paleolithic and Neolithic of the Levant”. Paléorient, 31(1): 176-185.
- Eliade, M., 2013, Images and symbols. Translated by Mohammad Kazem Mahajri, Chap Second, Tehran: Parse Book Translation and Publishing Company.
- Kramer, C., 1982, Village Ethnoarchaeology: Rural Iran in Archaeological Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
- Cattaneo-Vietti, R.; Doneddu, M. & Trainito, E., 2016, Man and Shells Molluscs in the History. Bentham Science Publishers.‏
- Clark, G. & Clark, J. G. D., 1986, Symbols of excellence: precious materials as expressions of status. Cambridge University Press.
- Donaldson, B., 2015, Magic, Myth and Folklore in Iran. The wild rue of Persia: Magic, myth and folklore in Iran. London: I. B. Tauris.
- Durante, S., 1977, “Marine shells from Balakot, Shahr-i Sokhta and Tepe Yahya”. Their significance for  trade and technology in ancient Indo-Iran, South Asian Archaeology, 1: 317.
- Eliade, M., 2014, Treatise on the history of religions. Translated by: Jal Satari, Fifth edition. Tehran: Neshar Soroush
- Evett, D., 1967, “Artifacts and architecture of the Iblis I period: Areas D, F, and G , Investigations at Tal-i-Iblis”. Preliminary reports, (9): 202-255.
- Caldwell, J. R., 1967, Investigations at Tal-i-Iblis. Illinois state Museum preliminary reports.‏
- Filberg, C. G., 1990, Il papi Kuchenshinan of northwestern Iran. Translation Asghar Karimi, Tehran: Farhangsara Publication.
- Fazai, Youssef, 1977 Social Foundations of Religion. First edition, Tehran: Neshar Shahreza
- Fletcher, A., 2015, ““From Person to Ancestor”, The Plastered Skull from Jericho”. Current World Archaeology, 74: 24-26.
- Gensheimer, T. R., 1984, “The role of shell in Mesopotamia evidence for trade exchange with Oman and the Indus valley”. Paléorient, 10 (1):  65-73.‏
- Golani, A., 2014, “Cowrie shells and their imitations as ornamental amulets in Egypt and the Near East”. Polish archaeology in the Mediterranean, 2 (XXIII): 71-83.
- Hassouri, A., 1992, Turkmen carpet patterns and neighboring peoples. 1st edition, Tehran: Neshar Farhangan.
- Hole, F.; Flannery, K. V. & Neely, J. A., 1969, Prehistory and human ecology of the Deh Luran Plain , an early village sequence from Khuzistan, Iran 1 (Vol 1). University of museum anthro archaeology.‏
- Ibn Ma’aruf, M., 2012, Arabic-Persian Dictionary. Editing: Reza Alavi Nasr, Tehran: Mortazavieh Publications.
- Jackson, J. W., 1917, Shells as Evidence of the Migration of Early Culture. Manchester University press.
- Jackson, A., 1978, Jackson’s travelogue of Iran passed away and now. Translated by: Manouchehr Amiri and Fereydoun Baderhai, second edition, Tehran: Neshar Sharami. Kharazmi Publications.
- Heath, B. J., 2016, “Cowrie shells, global trade, and local exchange: piecing together the evidence for colonial Virginia”. Historical Archaeology, 50 (2): 17-46.‏
- Ghirshman, R., 1938, “Fouilles de Sialk près de Kashan, 1933, 1934, 1937”. Vol. 1, Paul Geuthner,
-  Kenoyer, J. M., 1984, “Shell working industries of the Indus Civilization a summary”. Paleorient, 10 (1): 49-63.‏
- Kenyon, K. M., 1981, Excavations at Jericho (Vol 3). The architecture and stratigraphy of the Tell Plates Brit, School of Archeology in Jerusalem.‏
- Kovács, L. & Radócz, G., 2008, “Vulvae, Eyes, Snake Heads”,  archaeological finds of cowrie amulets (Vol. 1846). British Archaeological Reports Limited.‏
- Hubert, A. & Hubert, A., 1993, A Guide to Worldwide Cowries. Published by, Verlag Christ Hemmen.
- Mallowan, M. E. L., 1947, ““Brak and Chagar Bazar”. Part-I, Their Contribution to Archaeology”. IRAQ, 9(1): 10-47.‏
- Mohammad Hossein Bin Khalaf Tabrizi, 2012, Dairat al-Maarif of Decisive Proofs. Correction: Mohammad Moin, 7th edition, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
- Moorey, P. S., 1994, Ancient Mesopotamian materials and industries. The archaeological evidence. Oxford.
- Mortensen, I. D. & Nicolaisen, I., 1993, Nomads of Luristan: History, material culture, and pastoralism in western Iran. Thames and Hudson.‏
- Muscarella, O. W., 1974, “The Iron Age at Dinkha Tepe, Iran”.Metropolitan Museum Journal, (9): 35-90.
- Negahban, E. O., 1996, Marlik: the Complete Excavation Report. (Vol. 87), UPenn Museum of Archaeology.‏,
- Overlaet, B., 2003, The Early Iron Age in the Pusht-i Kuh, Luristan. Gent University.‏
- Polak, J., 1989, Pola K’s travel book: Iran and Iranians. Translation Kikavos Jahandari, 1st edition, Tehran: Neshar Kharazmi.
- Quenet, Ph., 2018, “Luxe ET transgression dans les cités-États sud-mésopotamiennes (3100-2350 av. J.-C.)”. d’après quelques séries d’objets en coquille. Ktèma, Civilisations d Lorient, de la Grèce ET de Rome Antiques (43): 5-34.
- Rice, C. C., 2004, Persian Women and Their Ways. Translation by: Asadullah Azad, 1st edition, Tehran: Neshar Ketabdar.
- Razi, H, 2001, Encyclopedia of Ancient Iran, Avestan Age to the End of the Era Sassanid First edition, third volume, Tehran: Neshar Sakhan.
- Reese, D. S., 1986, “Shells at Aphrodisias”. Prehistoric Aphrodisias, An Account of the Excavations and Artifact Studies, 191-196.‏
- Reese, D. S.; Woodeard, F. & Price, D., 1988, “Recent invertebrates as votive gifts”. The Egyptian Mining Temple at Timna, by B. Rothenberg. Researches in the Arabah(1).
- Reese, D. S. & Kühne, H., 1991, “Marine and Fresh-water Shells and an Ostrich Eggshell from Tall Šeḥ Hamad, Syria”. H. Kühne, Die Rezente Umwelt von Tall Šeḥ Hamad und Daten zur Umweltrekonstruktion der Assyrischen Stadt Dur-Katlimmu, (Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag): 133-6.‏
- Reese, D. S. 1989, “On cassid lips and helmet shells”. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 275(1): 33-39.‏
- Reese, D. S., 1998a, “Marine shells”. In: The Harra and the Hamad, Excavations and Surveys in n Eastern Jordan (1), Ed. by A. V. G. Betts, AM (9): 138.
- Reese, D. S., 1998b, Jericho shells Working Reanalysis. Chicago, Manuscript.
- Reese, D. S., 2003, “Banesh shells, shark/ray vertebrae, and eggshells from ABC and TUV”. In: William M. Sumner: Early Urban Life in n the Land of Anshan: Excavations at Tal-e Malyan in n the Highlands of Iran. Malyan Excavation Reports III/University Museum.
- Reese, D. S., 1989, “Treasures from the sea”. Expedition, 31 (2): 80.
- Ridout-Sharpe, J., 2017, “Shell ornaments, icons and other artefacts from the eastern Mediterranean and Levant, Molluscs in Archaeology, Methods”. Approaches and Applications, (3): 290.‏
- Saberi Eftakhari, A., 2013, “Belief in the existence of supernatural power in objects”. In: The popular culture of the people of Iran (fetishism = object of belief.”) Namah Ansanshanasi publication, 10: 78-113.
- Safer, J. N., 1982, Spirals form the Sea, An Anthropological Look at Shells. 1th edition, New York, USA.
- Schmidt, E. F.; Loon, M. N. V. & Curvers, H. H., 1989, The Holmes Expeditions to Luristan. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.‏
- Shaw, J., 2012, “Archaeology of religious change: introduction”. World Archaeology, 45 (1): 1-11,
- Stein, A., 1994, Old routes of western Iran. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtára: Kőrösi Csoma Társaság.‏.
- Stol, M. & Wiggermann, F. A. M., 2000, Birth in Babylonia and the Bible, its Mediterranean setting. (Vol 14), Brill.
- Tanavoli, P., 2017, Nomadic and rural styles of Iran, horse grooming. Print Ikme, Tehran: Yasawli Publications
- Tofighi, P., 2013, The comparative study of design and color in Nomadic Ropes of Bakhtiari and Ghashghaie Tribes, Period 03. Fifth, March 2013: 45-57.
- Tosi, M., (Ed). 1981, Conchiglie: il commercio e la lavorazione delle conchiglie marine nel medio oriente dal 4 al 2 millennio A.C. Roma, Palazzo Brancaccio, 14 maggio-19 luglio, De Luca.‏
- Trubitt, M. B. D., 2003, “The production and exchange of marine shell prestige goods”. Journal of Archaeological Research, 11(3): 243-277.‏
- Tylor, E. B., 1970, Religion In Primitive Culture. Harper torchbooks.
- Voigt, M. M., 1983, Hasanlu. Volume I: Hajji Firuz Tepe, Iran-The Neolithic Settlement. Vol. 1. UPenn Museum of Archaeology.
- Woolley, C. L., 1955, Excavations at Ur. London: Ernest Benn Ltd.
- Yang, B., 2019, Cowrie shells and cowrie money. A global history, Routledge.